hi, I've just update the in-tree version of NSD to v3.2.6 and would really appreciate some testing results on various platforms as well as feedback on the default configuration. The next step - if everything works nicely - is to enable NSD in the build and remove the NSD port. Note: zonec is called nsd-zonec in OpenBSD. this change will be phased into NLNetLabs NSD v3.3 as well. jakob
Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so, my initial searching shows NSD doesn't support caching nor views (although, my googling skills suck). Are these being considered? --patrick
searching shows NSD doesn't support caching nor views (although, my googling skills suck). Are these being considered? The plan is that Unbound will be imported as a caching recursive name server. Neither of them has support for views and I have no intention of retrofitting that. jakob
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200 There is something I never understand: why change more for less? i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature for nsd/unbound, that doesn't have 2/3 of bind features. and after all, it is not even a project developed under openbsd umbrella... -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
mature - eh? they keep rewriting it... here's the latest incarnation: http://bind10.isc.org/wiki/GettingStartedBIND10Development
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> is that for real? --patrick
because bind is a misdesigned piece of shit. -- Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:00:27 +0200 well, I can understand it, but, then why only nsd to the base, and not unbound? -- With best regards, Gregory Edigarov
hasn't been done yet. as simple as that. neither has bind been removed yet. -- Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
That was already mentioned and is pending. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
