Re: Testing NSD

Previous thread: Re: sbt/sdmmc locking update by Theo de Raadt on Saturday, August 21, 2010 - 5:30 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Mejore sus capacidades comerciales by Negocios y Audiolibros on Sunday, August 22, 2010 - 4:35 am. (1 message)
From: Jakob Schlyter
Subject: Testing NSD
Date: Sunday, August 22, 2010 - 2:35 am

hi,

I've just update the in-tree version of NSD to v3.2.6 and would really
appreciate some testing results on various platforms as well as feedback on
the default configuration.

The next step - if everything works nicely - is to enable NSD in the build and
remove the NSD port.

Note: zonec is called nsd-zonec in OpenBSD. this change will be phased into
NLNetLabs NSD v3.3 as well.


	jakob

From: patrick keshishian
Date: Sunday, August 22, 2010 - 7:16 pm

Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so,
my initial searching shows NSD doesn't support caching
nor views (although, my googling skills suck). Are these
being considered?

--patrick

From: Jakob Schlyter
Date: Sunday, August 22, 2010 - 10:30 pm

searching shows NSD doesn't support caching nor views (although, my googling
skills suck). Are these being considered?

The plan is that Unbound will be imported as a caching recursive name server.
Neither of them has support for views and I have no intention of retrofitting
that.

	jakob

From: Gregory Edigarov
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 1:57 am

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200
There is something I never understand: why change more for less?
i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature for nsd/unbound,
that doesn't have 2/3 of bind features.
and after all, it is not even a project developed under openbsd
umbrella... 

-- 
With best regards,
	Gregory Edigarov

From: Stuart Henderson
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 2:46 am

mature - eh? they keep rewriting it...
here's the latest incarnation:

http://bind10.isc.org/wiki/GettingStartedBIND10Development

From: patrick keshishian
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 2:44 pm

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>

is that for real?

--patrick

From: Otto Moerbeek
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 3:50 am

More features does not mean better.

	-Otto

From: Henning Brauer
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 4:00 am

because bind is a misdesigned piece of shit.

-- 
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting

From: Gregory Edigarov
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 6:50 am

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:00:27 +0200
well, I can understand it, but, then why only nsd to the base, and not
unbound?

-- 
With best regards,
	Gregory Edigarov

From: Henning Brauer
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 7:00 am

hasn't been done yet. as simple as that.
neither has bind been removed yet.

-- 
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting

From: Brad
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 7:01 am

That was already mentioned and is pending.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Previous thread: Re: sbt/sdmmc locking update by Theo de Raadt on Saturday, August 21, 2010 - 5:30 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Mejore sus capacidades comerciales by Negocios y Audiolibros on Sunday, August 22, 2010 - 4:35 am. (1 message)