On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:47:50PM -0700, russell wrote:
quoted text > Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:35:53PM -0700, russell wrote:
> >>Well it compiled, and runs, dmesg + Xorg.log follows. only Thing I
> >>"Think" i noticed is a sort of slower screen update, when updating
> >>large parts of the screen I get this crawl of updating segments down
> >>screen.
> >>
> >>regarding the kernel: GENERIC kernel with ath patches(poking around,
> >>trying to get my radio working)
> >>
> >>(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to detect GEM. Kernel 2.6.28 required.
> >
> >You did not read the message that introduced this driver. It said that
> >you must have "option INTELDRM_GEM" in your kernel config. If you get
> >that message, then you did not do this.
> >
> >-0-
>
> Well I feel stupid, sorry about that, I grabbed the wrong log file.
> because yeah the first time I added "option INTEMDRM_GEM" I was writing
> a detailed message on what I did, why it did not work etc... at
> which point I found my typo, corrected it, and everything ran just
> as it should. I then proceeded to include the first nonworking
> Xorg.log *sigh*.
Heh, happens to everyone sooner or later.
quoted text >
> well if it is worth anything to you here is the correct Xorg.log
> I was unable verify that it was in fact using the GEM driver interface
> I assume it is as that is the code I put in and X failed to start
> when I had the wrong option line in the kernel config.
Yes, that looks much better. So it is mostly ok?
-0-
--
"Here at the Phone Company, we serve all kinds of people; from
Presidents and Kings to the scum of the earth ..."
