Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ted Unangst
Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 - 9:48 am

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Jason McIntyre <jmc@kerhand.co.uk> wrote:

At one point I made an effort to consolidate it, but it was too much
churn for little gain.  I stopped after at least getting each man page
internally consistent.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
mistake in fsck_ffs.8, J.C. Roberts, (Wed Mar 3, 2:17 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, Otto Moerbeek, (Wed Mar 3, 3:36 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, Jason McIntyre, (Wed Mar 3, 3:44 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, J.C. Roberts, (Wed Mar 3, 3:59 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, Otto Moerbeek, (Wed Mar 3, 4:11 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, J.C. Roberts, (Wed Mar 3, 4:41 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, Igor Sobrado, (Wed Mar 3, 5:18 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, Otto Moerbeek, (Wed Mar 3, 5:24 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, Jason McIntyre, (Wed Mar 3, 6:07 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, J.C. Roberts, (Wed Mar 3, 6:38 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, Jason McIntyre, (Wed Mar 3, 6:50 am)
Re: mistake in fsck_ffs.8, Ted Unangst, (Wed Mar 3, 9:48 am)