Re: mpii enchancements

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Marco Peereboom
Date: Tuesday, February 9, 2010 - 9:41 am

I talked to Jim and he and I had exactly the same comments.  We love
this minus the numbers you pull out of an orifice ;-)

To be exact:

Both choices are bad.  This needs to come from the firmware and not made
up as we do now.  Jim's values are conservative, yours are probably ok
for *your* chip but no telling about others.  I think the port facts
pages has these.

I can go ahead and commit the rest.  Agree?

On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 07:13:36PM +0300, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
mpii enchancements, Mike Belopuhov, (Mon Feb 8, 9:13 am)
Re: mpii enchancements, Marco Peereboom, (Mon Feb 8, 7:48 pm)
Re: mpii enchancements, Mike Belopuhov, (Tue Feb 9, 3:14 am)
Re: mpii enchancements, Marco Peereboom, (Tue Feb 9, 9:41 am)
Re: mpii enchancements, Mike Belopuhov, (Tue Feb 9, 9:48 am)
Re: mpii enchancements, Mike Belopuhov, (Tue Feb 9, 11:25 am)
Re: mpii enchancements, Mike Belopuhov, (Mon Mar 1, 9:52 am)
Re: mpii enchancements, Marco Peereboom, (Mon Mar 1, 9:58 am)
Re: mpii enchancements, Mike Belopuhov, (Mon Mar 1, 10:16 am)
Re: mpii enchancements, Marco Peereboom, (Tue Mar 2, 2:41 pm)