Re: little cp diff

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Bob Beck
Date: Saturday, February 6, 2010 - 11:49 am

On 6 February 2010 11:37, Claus Assmann <ca+OpenBSD_tech@esmtp.org> wrote:

It belongs in *both* places. and the central place can do a better job
with better hints from userland.

There is a balance to be struck between doing things intelligently at
the source, and doing things with a central optimization.

If you go too far towards central optimization you get bloat like GCC
4 centrally..
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
little cp diff, Ted Unangst, (Fri Feb 5, 7:24 pm)
Re: little cp diff, Otto Moerbeek, (Sat Feb 6, 5:32 am)
Re: little cp diff, Mark Kettenis, (Sat Feb 6, 6:44 am)
Re: little cp diff, Ted Unangst, (Sat Feb 6, 7:14 am)
Re: little cp diff, Otto Moerbeek, (Sat Feb 6, 7:53 am)
Re: little cp diff, Vadim Zhukov, (Sat Feb 6, 8:27 am)
Re: little cp diff, Bob Beck, (Sat Feb 6, 9:45 am)
Re: little cp diff, Ted Unangst, (Sat Feb 6, 10:58 am)
Re: little cp diff, Bob Beck, (Sat Feb 6, 11:32 am)
Re: little cp diff, Otto Moerbeek, (Sat Feb 6, 11:35 am)
Re: little cp diff, Claus Assmann, (Sat Feb 6, 11:37 am)
Re: little cp diff, Claudio Jeker, (Sat Feb 6, 11:42 am)
Re: little cp diff, Bob Beck, (Sat Feb 6, 11:45 am)
Re: little cp diff, Bob Beck, (Sat Feb 6, 11:49 am)
Re: little cp diff, Ted Unangst, (Sat Feb 6, 8:42 pm)