Re: xargs -0 and -L

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Philip Guenther
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2010 - 10:59 am

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Atte Peltomdki <atte.peltomaki@iki.fi> wrote:

We understand the purpose of -0.  Are you sure you understand the
difference between -n and -L?  AFAICT, the behavior you desire can be
obtained portably and without requiring an alteration to the
definition of 'line' using -0 -n # -x


Philip Guenther
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
xargs -0 and -L, Antti Harri, (Tue Feb 2, 10:31 am)
Re: xargs -0 and -L, Ingo Schwarze, (Tue Feb 2, 1:32 pm)
Re: xargs -0 and -L, Antti Harri, (Tue Feb 2, 11:54 pm)
Re: xargs -0 and -L, Atte , (Thu Feb 4, 3:48 am)
Re: xargs -0 and -L, Philip Guenther, (Thu Feb 4, 10:59 am)
Re: xargs -0 and -L, Ingo Schwarze, (Thu Feb 4, 6:49 pm)
Re: xargs -0 and -L, Atte , (Fri Feb 5, 3:14 am)
Re: xargs -0 and -L, Marc Espie, (Fri Feb 5, 4:46 am)