Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tobias Weingartner
Date: Saturday, February 20, 2010 - 1:49 pm

On Saturday, February 20, Miod Vallat wrote:

From the point of view of the MBR, not really.  They're both
corruption.  One just happens to be more likely to be survivable,
but since we have no checksums/etc to doublecheck the validity
of the MBR, they both amount to garbage.  One just happens to be
a tad more palatable.

--Toby.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
enhancing i386 mbr.S, Giuseppe Magnotta, (Sat Feb 20, 6:29 am)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Han Boetes, (Sat Feb 20, 7:54 am)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Giuseppe Magnotta, (Sat Feb 20, 8:42 am)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S , Tobias Weingartner, (Sat Feb 20, 12:00 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S , Tobias Weingartner, (Sat Feb 20, 12:08 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Giuseppe Magnotta, (Sat Feb 20, 12:25 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Ted Unangst, (Sat Feb 20, 12:36 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S , Tobias Weingartner, (Sat Feb 20, 1:03 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Giuseppe Magnotta, (Sat Feb 20, 1:33 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Miod Vallat, (Sat Feb 20, 1:41 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S , Tobias Weingartner, (Sat Feb 20, 1:49 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Kenneth R Westerback, (Sat Feb 20, 6:01 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S , Tobias Weingartner, (Sat Feb 20, 6:44 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Kenneth R Westerback, (Sat Feb 20, 7:04 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Ted Unangst, (Sat Feb 20, 7:18 pm)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Giuseppe Magnotta, (Sun Feb 21, 4:57 am)
Re: enhancing i386 mbr.S, Denis Doroshenko, (Sun Feb 21, 4:46 pm)