Re: correct mxcsr+mxcsr_mask handling (revised)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Josh Elsasser
Date: Monday, December 27, 2010 - 3:05 pm

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:07:55PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:

Works for me, X runs and test program no longer drops us into ddb:

OpenBSD 4.8-current (GENERIC) #43: Mon Dec 27 13:08:01 PST 2010
    joshe@flint.joshe.fake:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.40GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.40 GHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,TM,SBF

It couldn't hurt to also test this on a machine where the fxsave
instruction writes an empty mask. This should be any machine with SSE
is in the cpu flags list and without SSE2.

ok joshe@

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
correct mxcsr+mxcsr_mask handling (revised), Philip Guenther, (Sat Dec 25, 1:02 pm)
Re: correct mxcsr+mxcsr_mask handling (revised), Kenneth R Westerback, (Sun Dec 26, 7:06 am)
Re: correct mxcsr+mxcsr_mask handling (revised), Mark Kettenis, (Sun Dec 26, 8:24 am)
Re: correct mxcsr+mxcsr_mask handling (revised), Philip Guenther, (Sun Dec 26, 10:57 pm)
Re: correct mxcsr+mxcsr_mask handling (revised), Mark Kettenis, (Mon Dec 27, 9:20 am)
Re: correct mxcsr+mxcsr_mask handling (revised), Philip Guenther, (Mon Dec 27, 1:07 pm)
Re: correct mxcsr+mxcsr_mask handling (revised), Josh Elsasser, (Mon Dec 27, 3:05 pm)