Re: better matching of boot devices on amd64

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Kenneth R Westerback
Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010 - 5:35 am

On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:17:53PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:

If this works then ok krw@. Certainly comparing all the fields is
better as far as I am concerned.

My only twinge is relying on the overflow of the unit field. Some
clever dick (intern?) may look at MAKEBOOTDEV() some day and apply
the masks as the word is being constructed. Perhaps a cautionary
note in sys/sys/reboot.h saying we rely on unit overflowing would
not go amiss.

.... Ken

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
better matching of boot devices on amd64, David Gwynne, (Wed Dec 1, 10:17 pm)
Re: better matching of boot devices on amd64, Kenneth R Westerback, (Thu Dec 2, 5:35 am)
Re: better matching of boot devices on amd64, David Gwynne, (Thu Dec 2, 6:42 pm)