Re: hotplug(4) r1.10 ignoring hotplug_put_event() prior to hotplugopen() [Was: hotplugd(8) ignoring devices attached before boot]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:55 +0100

A bit late to the game, but I don't really agree with Tedu that the
changed behaviour is an improvement.  Say I have configured
hotplugd(8) such that it automatically mounts things when I plug in my
camera.  Now I reboot my machine, without unplugging the camera.
Previously hotplugd(8) would remount things upon boot.  Now suddenly
it doesn't and I have to unplug and replug the camera.


That looks like an improvement to me.


But this just seems to change the wording without actually changing
the meaning.  I think the existing wording is better.


Adding comments like this, describing historical behaviour really
isn't such a good idea.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: hotplug(4) r1.10 ignoring hotplug_put_event() prior to ..., Mark Kettenis, (Mon Dec 13, 5:41 am)
Re: hotplug(4) r1.10 ignoring hotplug_put_event() prior to ..., Joachim Schipper, (Tue Dec 14, 12:58 am)