Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Philip Guenther
Date: Sunday, May 3, 2009 - 9:15 pm

On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Marco S Hyman <marc@snafu.org> wrote:

Hah, let me break out the sack cloth and ashes...



I agree.  The behavior of this case was asked about on the
austin-group mailing list; the only response was this:

https://www.opengroup.org/sophocles/show_mail.tpl?CALLER=show_archive.tpl&sou
rce=L&listname=austin-group-l&id=5123

...which makes sense to me.  libpthread has the first behavior
mentioned there, while librthread has the third.


Philip Guenther
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Tobias Ulmer, (Sun May 3, 12:26 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Marco S Hyman, (Sun May 3, 1:57 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Tobias Ulmer, (Sun May 3, 3:18 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, patrick keshishian, (Sun May 3, 4:44 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Tobias Ulmer, (Sun May 3, 5:45 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, patrick keshishian, (Sun May 3, 6:05 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Philip Guenther, (Sun May 3, 6:18 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Marco S Hyman, (Sun May 3, 6:27 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, patrick keshishian, (Sun May 3, 7:07 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Ted Unangst, (Sun May 3, 7:16 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Tobias Ulmer, (Sun May 3, 7:41 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Tobias Ulmer, (Sun May 3, 7:44 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Philip Guenther, (Sun May 3, 8:28 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Marco S Hyman, (Sun May 3, 8:56 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Philip Guenther, (Sun May 3, 9:15 pm)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Artur Grabowski, (Mon May 4, 2:03 am)
Re: blocked_dup2.c testcase wrong?, Kurt Miller, (Thu May 7, 8:08 am)