Re: pfsync and byte/packet counters

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ryan McBride
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 9:25 pm

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:30:49PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:

This is true, but the design decision predates the use of pfsync_* for
the pf ioctls.

In pre-pflow(4) days, people might also use the output on the pfsync
interface either directly or via some netflow conversion to gather usage
data for their traffic, so it's needed there as well.

In the original pfsync implementation I considered trying to synchronize
the counters as well, but making sure you don't over/under count if
packets hit both firewalls would have made it overly complicated.

-Ryan
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
pfsync and byte/packet counters, Alexander Sabourenkov, (Tue Feb 17, 5:19 am)
Re: pfsync and byte/packet counters, David Gwynne, (Tue Feb 17, 5:30 am)
Re: pfsync and byte/packet counters, Alexander Sabourenkov, (Tue Feb 17, 7:01 am)
Re: pfsync and byte/packet counters, Ryan McBride, (Tue Feb 17, 9:25 pm)
Re: pfsync and byte/packet counters, David Gwynne, (Tue Feb 17, 9:52 pm)