Re: MTA choice

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dave Anderson
Date: Friday, August 13, 2010 - 8:34 am

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, jy-p@fixedpointgroup.com wrote:


You imply that sendmail is _only_ fine for such limited uses, which is
certainly not true in my experience; I'm curious as to why you believe
this.

It doesn't require (or, AFAICT, benefit in any way) from users having
any sort of account (let alone a system account) on the mailserver
itself, and it's not hard to set up multiple domains on the same server.

While I haven't needed to do it myself, there's plenty of anecdotal
evidence of large, busy mailservers running sendmail.

I'm _not_ arguing whether sendmail is better or worse than the
alternatives; while I've looked at a few others, I've never used any of
them -- so I don't have any real basis for an opinion.  I _have_ been
using sendmail (on a light-duty, mostly-home mailserver) for 15 years.

	Dave

-- 
Dave Anderson
<dave@daveanderson.com>
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: MTA choice, Dave Anderson, (Fri Aug 13, 8:34 am)
Re: MTA choice, Jacob Yocom-Piatt, (Fri Aug 13, 10:03 am)
Re: MTA choice, Bret S. Lambert, (Fri Aug 13, 10:06 am)
Re: MTA choice, Martin Schröder, (Fri Aug 13, 11:55 am)