Re: EM_MIPS==LOONGSON?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Miod Vallat
Date: Saturday, July 17, 2010 - 3:46 am

> I was reading ELF headers from different arches when I found that for

Yes and no. This value was initially registered by Mips as R3000 BE, but
as the various operating systems availble on mips-compatible cpus
switched from ECOFF to ELF, they have reused this value even if the
processor model or endianness was different.

This doesn't mattter much since endianness and 32 vs 64 bit information
is found in the e_ident field of the ELF header.

Miod
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
EM_MIPS==LOONGSON?, Jordi Beltran Creix, (Fri Jun 18, 8:18 pm)
Re: EM_MIPS==LOONGSON?, Miod Vallat, (Sat Jul 17, 3:46 am)