On Jun 7, 2010, at 9:01 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
quoted text
> hmm. your understanding is correct, the in is (kind of, practically it
> is, we won't hit the rule unless the "in" condition in the anchor is
> true) inherited. the little validity check in pfctl doesn't grok that
> tho. hrm.

Thanks for validating my thinking. Besides the configuration
being valid, is that kind of use of anchors good practice?

Should I submit a bug report on pfctl, or what do you guys here
prefer? I have no time to fix it right now, I just keep
being "unanchored" for now :-)

Teemu