Re: pf anchors

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Kevin Chadwick
Date: Thursday, June 10, 2010 - 8:03 am

> no. it is imposing limits that should not be there and that the new pf

Is it not even slightly required or would a warning message be
appropriate.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
pf anchors, Teemu Rinta-aho, (Mon Jun 7, 10:45 am)
Re: pf anchors, Henning Brauer, (Mon Jun 7, 11:01 am)
Re: pf anchors, Teemu Rinta-aho, (Mon Jun 7, 11:17 am)
Re: pf anchors, Henning Brauer, (Mon Jun 7, 12:05 pm)
Re: pf anchors, Teemu Rinta-aho, (Mon Jun 7, 12:22 pm)
Re: pf anchors, Henning Brauer, (Tue Jun 8, 4:14 am)
Re: pf anchors, Kevin Chadwick, (Thu Jun 10, 8:03 am)
Re: pf anchors, Henning Brauer, (Thu Jun 10, 9:10 am)