Re: [Bulk] Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jussi Peltola
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 - 5:21 pm

On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 07:27:46PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:

If it's your mail server and clients you can just force certificate
checking on the hosts you want to connect to with tls. Using a different
port adds no cryptographic security (authentication) at all, so it's
useless complexity.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 4, 1:08 pm)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Hugo Villeneuve, (Tue May 4, 5:57 pm)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 5, 1:46 am)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Wed May 5, 3:18 am)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 5, 7:30 am)
tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 5, 8:06 am)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Jussi Peltola, (Wed May 5, 8:41 am)
Re: [Bulk] Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 5, 11:27 am)
Re: [Bulk] Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Jussi Peltola, (Wed May 5, 5:21 pm)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Chris Dukes, (Thu May 6, 10:00 am)
Re: [Bulk] Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 12, 3:12 pm)