Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Kevin Chadwick
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 - 1:46 am

> STARTTLS should be the first command the client issues, long before

Sorry,

I maybe confused about the term for MTAs using ssl to deliver mail to
me. I just feel wrong using tls for delivering mail to other servers or
atleast a hop, without letting them do the same. Obviously the benefits
of spamd outweigh the tls. I was wondering about something like
relayd, nginx or stunnell in front of spamd but I think that I
would either break allowing plain connections or would have to provide
a way of bypassing relayd using submission and smtp ports, which I won't
do.

KeV
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 4, 1:08 pm)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Hugo Villeneuve, (Tue May 4, 5:57 pm)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 5, 1:46 am)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Wed May 5, 3:18 am)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 5, 7:30 am)
tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 5, 8:06 am)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Jussi Peltola, (Wed May 5, 8:41 am)
Re: [Bulk] Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 5, 11:27 am)
Re: [Bulk] Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Jussi Peltola, (Wed May 5, 5:21 pm)
Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Chris Dukes, (Thu May 6, 10:00 am)
Re: [Bulk] Re: tls proxy in front of spamd?, Kevin Chadwick, (Wed May 12, 3:12 pm)