Re: State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter N. M. Hansteen
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 - 2:12 am

Juan Miscaro <jmiscaro@gmail.com> writes:


I would think that would be a fair question to ask the person who told
you PF is garbage because it is multithreaded: 

    "Under what circumstances would threading or lack thereof have
     have identifiable impact on performance?"

If they can't come up with a coherent answer to that question, this is
just yet another iteration of the "OpenBSD is {crap,insecure,written
and used only by dickheads} because it does not have $my_favorite_toy"
nonsense.

- P
-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD, Juan Miscaro, (Tue May 4, 7:15 pm)
Re: State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD, Marco Peereboom, (Tue May 4, 7:45 pm)
Re: State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD, Christiano F. Haesbaert, (Tue May 4, 8:34 pm)
Re: State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Wed May 5, 2:12 am)
Re: State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Wed May 5, 2:18 am)
Re: State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD, Marco Peereboom, (Wed May 5, 11:09 am)
Re: State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez, (Wed May 5, 7:58 pm)
Re: State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD, Stas Miasnikou, (Wed May 5, 11:47 pm)
Re: State of multiprocessing and multithreading in OpenBSD, Tony Abernethy, (Wed May 5, 11:55 pm)