Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2010 » May » 3

Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
Subject: Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs
Date: Sunday, May 2, 2010 - 5:31 pm

> OpenBSD's stock httpd is very slow and outdated. It is about 6 years old.

I will print this mail and laugh everyday with it. :)
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO, (Sun May 2, 5:31 pm)
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., Dexter Tomisson, (Mon May 3, 12:10 am)
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., Tomas Bodzar, (Mon May 3, 1:01 am)
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., Lars Nooden, (Mon May 3, 1:15 am)
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., Jure Pečar, (Mon May 3, 1:54 am)
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., Tomas Bodzar, (Mon May 3, 3:49 am)
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., Jacob Yocom-Piatt, (Mon May 3, 5:19 am)
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., Stuart Henderson, (Mon May 3, 5:32 am)
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., Kevin Chadwick, (Mon May 3, 10:46 am)
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? * ..., Scott McEachern, (Mon May 3, 6:29 pm)