Re: Premature end of archive

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: J.C. Roberts
Date: Sunday, April 25, 2010 - 12:45 am

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:56:48 +0700 sonjaya <sonjaya@gmail.com> wrote:


Signature based detection has always been flawed, and worse, as the
volume of malware increases, so does the number of "illegal" byte
sequences. The result is obvious; more and more stuff will be blocked
due to false positives.

Using encryption (ssh, scp, ssl) is a way around this problem, and if
it does happen when using encryption, then just change to using a
different cypher (resulting in a different byte sequence).

	jcr

-- 
The OpenBSD Journal - http://www.undeadly.org
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Premature end of archive, sonjaya, (Wed Nov 4, 3:49 am)
Re: Premature end of archive, Nick Guenther, (Wed Nov 4, 5:11 am)
Re: Premature end of archive, sonjaya, (Wed Nov 4, 5:49 am)
Re: Premature end of archive, FRLinux, (Wed Nov 4, 6:10 am)
Re: Premature end of archive, J.C. Roberts, (Thu Nov 5, 2:54 am)
Re: Premature end of archive, sonjaya, (Thu Apr 22, 3:56 am)
Re: Premature end of archive, J.C. Roberts, (Sun Apr 25, 12:45 am)