Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ted Unangst
Date: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 - 6:39 am

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Alexander Hall <halex@openbsd.org> wrote:

Blech.  Talk about hacks, counting out 13 stars?  We already have
special handling for skey, which I guess demonstrates it's used a fair
bit more than radius, but I'd like to get a quorum of developers to
agree on something better.  All * looks to me like "extra disabled".

For the OP, might I suggest "radiusenabled" for a bit of clarity?
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Andrew Klettke, (Mon Apr 19, 12:14 pm)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Ted Unangst, (Mon Apr 19, 2:34 pm)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Andrew Klettke, (Mon Apr 19, 2:42 pm)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Ted Unangst, (Mon Apr 19, 3:04 pm)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Andrew Klettke, (Mon Apr 19, 3:09 pm)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Bryan Irvine, (Mon Apr 19, 3:13 pm)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Nicholas Marriott, (Mon Apr 19, 3:29 pm)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Stuart Henderson, (Mon Apr 19, 11:37 pm)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Alexander Hall, (Tue Apr 20, 4:04 am)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Apr 20, 4:21 am)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Ted Unangst, (Tue Apr 20, 6:39 am)
Re: Radius Auth and Insecurity Outputs, Nicholas Marriott, (Tue Apr 20, 4:05 pm)