Re: earmark on hfsplus port

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dale Rahn
Date: Monday, March 22, 2010 - 12:42 pm

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:39:07AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:

It should be possible to build the port on i386 with the 'ONLY_FOR' tag
changed, however I dont recall that the hfsplus code was new enough to
support case-sensitive filesystems. Testing would need to be done to verify
what filesystems (hfs/hfs+/journal/case-sensitive) features would work with
the hfsplus package if the macos partition was cleanly shut down (journal).
If someone were to do this testing and post a diff to ports@ with such
testing results, such diff would likely be accepted.

Dale Rahn				drahn@dalerahn.com
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
earmark on hfsplus port, Ted Roby, (Mon Mar 22, 9:59 am)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Bryan Irvine, (Mon Mar 22, 10:07 am)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Ted Roby, (Mon Mar 22, 10:27 am)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Otto Moerbeek, (Mon Mar 22, 10:30 am)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Ted Roby, (Mon Mar 22, 10:39 am)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Ted Unangst, (Mon Mar 22, 10:45 am)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Dale Rahn, (Mon Mar 22, 12:42 pm)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Ted Roby, (Mon Mar 22, 1:11 pm)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, bofh, (Mon Mar 22, 4:12 pm)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Ted Roby, (Mon Mar 22, 7:58 pm)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Ron McDowell, (Mon Mar 22, 9:14 pm)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, patrick keshishian, (Mon Mar 22, 9:46 pm)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Ron McDowell, (Mon Mar 22, 10:03 pm)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Rod Whitworth, (Mon Mar 22, 10:28 pm)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, patrick keshishian, (Mon Mar 22, 10:29 pm)
Re: earmark on hfsplus port, Ted Roby, (Tue Mar 23, 8:02 am)