Given the above, is openbsd going to stick with Apache 1.3?

[ message continues ]

OpenBSD apache 1.3 != apache 1.3

What is wrong with apache in base?

And if you don't like it what is wrong with apache 2 in ports?

Or any other web server in ports for that matter.


[ message continues ]

My question after reading the news was: Will OpenBSD update its
in-base Apache to 1.3.42, or will it stick with 1.3.29? If not I'd
like to know why. I can understand the licensing issue of upgrading to
Apache 2, the fact that updating an in-base program such as Apache
which, AFAIK, has had some improvements from the OpenBSD people, might
be time consuming, and the fact that maybe Apache 1.3.29 it's just
good enough. But I'd like to know which one of these theories is
correct, I'm just curious.

Greetings.

[ message continues ]

The license for the new 1.3 stuff is also unacceptable (same as 2).
Besides it doesn't have all the Henning love either...


[ message continues ]

blatant case of stockholm syndrome! ;)


Sevan

[ message continues ]

I'll trust henning drunk over the apache foundation.


[ message continues ]

I dunno, rumor has it he listens to humppa while drinking.

[ message continues ]