Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -> ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Aaron Mason
Date: Thursday, February 25, 2010 - 7:01 pm

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Pete Vickers <pete@systemnet.no> wrote:
:

Only you can answer that, Pete.

Try increasing it gradually until the errors go away.  And if the
error returns, increase it again.  If it makes your system unstable,
lower it until it returns to stability.  Increments (and decrements,
if necessary) of 256 would probably be wise.

Getting the right balance with any system is all about trial and error
- trying different things until things are running smoothly - or
acceptably so in some situations.  It's also about the balance between
workability and stability.  Sometimes you just can't have your cake
and eat it too - stability must be the priority.

My $0.02 there.

--
Aaron Mason - Programmer, open source addict
I've taken my software vows - for beta or for worse
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
kern.maxclusters: 6144 -&gt; ?, Pete Vickers, (Wed Feb 24, 4:04 pm)
Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -> ?, Aaron Mason, (Thu Feb 25, 7:01 pm)
Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -&gt; ?, Pete Vickers, (Fri Feb 26, 3:30 am)
Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -&gt; ?, Claudio Jeker, (Fri Feb 26, 3:58 am)
Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -&gt; ?, Pete Vickers, (Mon Mar 1, 4:15 am)
Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -&gt; ?, Otto Moerbeek, (Mon Mar 1, 4:32 am)
Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -&gt; ?, Henning Brauer, (Mon Mar 1, 6:48 am)
Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -&gt; ?, Claudio Jeker, (Mon Mar 1, 7:28 am)
Re: kern.maxclusters: 6144 -&gt; ?, Henning Brauer, (Mon Mar 1, 9:36 am)