I am pleased to inform you that today February 22, 2010, Emerald Who's Who for Executives and Professionals has selected you as potential candidate into our organization to represent Mexico and the latin professional community. Emerald is the authority for professional networking and recognition in virtually every industry across the globe. In the current economic climate, it is important to be part of a network of professionals to assist with seeking the best possible candidates ...

ouch. try 'cksum -c SHA256'...

Hi, A proxy (squid) server running i368/4.6RELEASE with around 800 users, what would be a reasonable value to increase kern.maxclusters too, to cure this : root@proxy-s ~> grep mcl /var/log/messages Dec 10 10:13:43 proxy-s /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters Dec 10 11:06:07 proxy-s /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters Dec 15 13:41:48 proxy-s /bsd: WARNING: mclpools limit reached; increase kern.maxclusters root@proxy-s ~> ...

If I'm reading the manpages and latest CVS correctly, OpenBGPD does not yet support SAFI_MULTICAST for either IPv4 or IPv6, although some of the hooks appear to be present. Does anyone have a good feel for how much effort would be required to add this functionality (or just where changes need to be made)? It looks to be the big sticking point in moving from quagga to OpenBGPD. Thanks, Michael

I'm running 4.6 (release, I think) on a Soekris Net 4501. See dmesg, below. I recently got a Wistron CM9 (ath) mini-pci card for it (I've been running, wired-only, for 4-5 years). I'm getting a couple different error messages while attempting to use it. I initially thought (hoped) that the problem was an insufficient power supply (12V 1.2A). I have since tried two other power supplies (up to 12V 2.5A) and still have the same problems. Most of the time the Soekris ends up hanging or otherwise ...

I suspect you have found a bug in OpenBSD, so i have just posted a patch to tech@.

http://old.nabble.com/The-insecurity-of-OpenBSD-td27268082.html

Will the mouth-breathers please start searching the mailing list? This has already been trolled, killed, and thankfully, you've re-zombied it. *golf clap* Also, get a better mail service, and e-mail handle... both blow...

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, carlos albino garcia grijalba <translation> trolling trolling trolling:: http://trolling.trolling.troll/troll/troll/troll/trolling-trolls-of-trollovia/ troll? </translation> hth gfy

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:02 PM, carlos albino garcia grijalba Old, move along. http://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg86163.html

I foud this: http://allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/the-insecurity-of-openbsd/ so ? _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsofts powerful SPAM protection. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:36 +0000, "carlos albino garcia grijalba" OpenBSD doesn't have the rubber stamps. That's what confuses people. However, it has been certified for use by circus clowns (under certain conditions and restrictions):

Only filesystem backups are recorded in /etc/dumpdates. If you dump the filesystem that /etc is in (/), then it'll be recorded as you expect.

Hi all, i try to authenticate at my sshd using login_-ldap and login_radius both are not working with sshd only if i do a dry run on the commandline the login is passed. In the debug run of radius and the slapd i figured out that the sshd is passing the username ==> "NOUSER" to the login progs!! Did anyone had an idea? thanks in adv. Markus -- Diese Nachricht wurde auf Viren und andere gefdhrliche Inhalte untersucht und ist - aktuelle Virenscanner vorausgesetzt - sauber. For all ...

Hi, gentleman! Ill let you go to the whims of fate... If I were to kiss your luscious lips and drink of them their wine I will love you more and ask you to be mine. If you were to hold me in your arms and rock me off to sleep, I will lay there all night long. I'll say that "I am yours to keep." We will be blessed with a love that will shine... I dont know what to say... But I will always be here togetherandforever.com/fantasyfeel/ when you need me... To say that I love you... I will see ...

Would the following be an improvement for the documentation? Feel free to flame my mdoc(7) skills or lack thereof. Regards, Rogier ### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0 #P man5 Index: core.5 =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/core.5,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 core.5 --- core.5 31 May 2007 19:19:58 -0000 1.12 +++ core.5 24 Feb 2010 18:57:21 -0000 @@ -158,7 +158,16 @@ .Xr gdb 1 , .Xr pmdb 1 , .Xr ...

NOKIA UK PROMOTION 42 Park Avenue, Barbourne, Worcester, United Kingdom Attention: Winner, Congratulation your email address has just won you the sum of ?120.000 on the ongoing Nokia Promo Uk In line with the commemorating event marking our 142nd anniversary we rolled out over ?850,000.00( Eight Hundre and fifity thousand Britain Pounds) for our 142nd Anniversary Draws.All participants were selected through acomputer ballot system drawn form 25,000 company e-mail addresses For claims ...

Yeah, that would be great. I'll look around and see if I can borrow one or two from one of my co-contractors. thanks

Thanks Theo for your quick post. Good news then, so I will proceed with my buying :) I wish I could donate a third one but my University's budget sax big time... I've noticed that you mentioned amd64. Is it preferred over i386 for this platform? Cause I've read a couple of times on this list that i386 runs better (at least for firewalls). regards, Giannis

One of the 10G cards I am using is: ppb3 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "PLX PEX 8648" rev 0xbb pci4 at ppb3 bus 5 ppb4 at pci4 dev 4 function 0 "PLX PEX 8648" rev 0xbb: apic 1 int 6 (irq 0) pci5 at ppb4 bus 6 ix0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 10GbE SFP+ (82599)" rev 0x01: apic 1 int 6 (irq 15), address 00:12:c0:88:27:38 ix1 at pci5 dev 0 function 1 "Intel 10GbE SFP+ (82599)" rev 0x01: apic 1 int 13 (irq 14), address 00:12:c0:88:27:39 ppb5 at pci4 dev 5 function 0 "PLX PEX 8648" rev 0xbb: apic 1 ...

Hey Marco, what 10G NICs are you using? diana

I've also found these 2 bug reports for R610: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=124808217718524&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=126480343816982&w=2 Giannis

I think he means untar is faster but doing ls, uname etc is slower WHILE doing the untar. It's a fair enough question till you actually think about it. I think Tobias Ulmer summed it up best

if by -current snapshot you mean openbsd 4.6 then yes, that's what i'm using. Noah McNallie n0ah

Simplified explaination. Without softdeps, your tar does one disk write and waits for it to finish, then ls does one disk read and waits for it to finish. Continue until done. With softdeps, tar will fill the whole buffer cache with writes, not letting any other process run, then ls will try to read one block, wait for at least one write to finish before it can get a buffer, but in the mean time, tar will be awoken by those writes finishing and schedule even more writes before ls gets the ...

where's your dmesg? have you tried a -current snapshot?

after reading this, i would guess it was enabling READPRIO in netbsd that fixed it, as that gives reading priority.. though softdeps did not stop increasing performance, tar files still extracted at ~25x the rate.. i dunno, you guys can write me down all you want, i won't even make fun of openbsd for not having a disk scheduler. and i still adore it, my next bat is at how to remove it's security implementations to speed it up. Noah McNallie n0ah

So, your system is "slow" _without_ softupdates?

BTW this is great paper about SoftUpdates and journaling http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix2000/general/full_papers/... which I found as link in old interview with Theo http://kerneltrap.org/node/6 I know now more about meta-data and similar stuff. -- http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html

please read latest post Noah McNallie n0ah

I do believe that's Artur's response explained earlier.

Hello, I believe that these disks are SATA II (http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=6278576e14ee9110VgnVCM100000 f5ee0a0aRCRD) and thus would always fall under wd driver as per the man page. I believe that sd is for scsi only. Is this assumption ...

I think, that someone told to you that you must use current ;-) Anyway here you can find something about AHCI and SATA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA If you don't have option to turn AHCI on in your BIOS then you may have problems. If you will read this http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ahci&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath =OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html then you will know that AHCI simulate SCSCI and that's why your disk will be sd ...

though. Ifstated and a couple of anchor sets works well for me. Have a core set of rules in pf.conf and two anchors. Pull in and out the anchors depending on the status of the links as detected by ifstated. -Steve S.

i don't plan on doing any fancy stuff. just load balance outgoing requests between the two PPPeO connections. as far as i can see, yes, a NAT pool for outgoing connections. i need something more solid tho since i am just beginning to understand how to do things with PF.

man zstty (the manpage doesn't mention the dev nodes, bug) you use the regular device nodes, i think /dev/ttya and /dev/cuaa in this case - zs DOES support cua, with a limitation mentioned in the manpage. the device i had in mind that doesn't support cua on sparc(64) was spif. -- Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting

Ryan's commit actually removed a very similar line. $ cd /usr/src/sys/net $ cvs diff -D 2010/01/11 -D 2010/01/12 pf_table.c Index: pf_table.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/openbsd/src/sys/net/pf_table.c,v retrieving revision 1.80 retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -p -r1.80 -r1.81 --- pf_table.c 24 Nov 2008 13:22:09 -0000 1.80 +++ pf_table.c 12 Jan 2010 03:20:51 -0000 1.81 [... snip! ...] @@ -1087,7 +1111,6 @@ ...

Sorry to hijack that thread while it is getting old... It seems that it is easier for people in northern America (but maybe USA only) to get Gdium Liberty netbooks, rather than Lemote Yeeloong netbooks. The OpenBSD/loongson port runs on the Gdium about as badly as on the Yeeloong - which basically means that neither support suspend at the moment (to be fair, Gdium audio is not supported either... but the keyboard is much better). People curious to try OpenBSD on these low-power MIPS ...