Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Noah McNallie
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 - 8:19 pm

On 02/23/2010 08:47 PM, Bryan wrote:

if by -current snapshot you mean openbsd 4.6 then yes, that's what i'm 
using.

Noah McNallie
n0ah
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Noah McNallie, (Tue Feb 23, 5:20 pm)
Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Noah McNallie, (Tue Feb 23, 8:19 pm)
Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Rafael Ferreira Neves, (Tue Feb 23, 8:31 pm)
Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Bret S. Lambert, (Wed Feb 24, 2:59 am)
Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Marco Peereboom, (Wed Feb 24, 5:39 am)
Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Artur Grabowski, (Wed Feb 24, 5:41 am)
Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Noah McNallie, (Wed Feb 24, 11:02 am)
Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Noah McNallie, (Wed Feb 24, 11:03 am)
Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Tony Abernethy, (Wed Feb 24, 11:18 am)
Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?, Noah McNallie, (Wed Feb 24, 11:36 am)