| Jan Stary | uaudio - Lexicon Alpha
I consider buying the Lexicon Alpha souncard:
http://www.lexiconpro.com/product.php?id=7
Is someone using it sucessfully? I understand there
are "USB soundcards" out there not even appearing as
USB Audio class devices.
If this card is not working properly with 4.6 or current,
can people recommend a good uaudio card?
I need it to be uaudio become the machine that will use it
does not have any possibility of holding a PCI card.
More generally, what is the status of uaudio(4)?
| Feb 20, 4:29 pm 2010 |
| 1-2 марта 2010 г. | Финансовый контроль и управление рисками бизнесаriq
************************************************************
* 01 - 02 P<P0QQP0 2010P3.
*
* P$PP PP P!P PP+P PP P P"P P PP, P P#P P PPPPP PP
P PP!PPP P PPPP PP!P
*
************************************************************
P P PPPPP(PP.P"P!P/: QQP:P>P2P>P4P8QP5P;P8 P:P>P<P?P0P=P8P9:
QP>P1QQP2P5P=P=P8P:P8, P3P5P=P5QP0P;Q P=Q P5 P4P8QP5P:QP>QP0 ...
| Feb 20, 1:07 pm 2010 |
| Robert | IPSEC encodes traffic to local IP?
Hi,
I'm setting up an ipsec connection between two hosts and I noticed that
as soon as ipsec is active, any TCP and UDP traffic (but not ICMP??) to
the local IP gets redirected to the enc0 interface and shows up as
encoded traffic originating from the other(!) endpoint.
It doesn't matter if the other endpoint actually exists / is online.
(If the other host is online, the traffic *between them* works as
expected = encrypted)
My expectation (from the flows in ipsec.conf) would be that ...
| Feb 20, 12:52 pm 2010 |
| Canadian Subsidy Dir ... | Canadian Subsidy Directory 2010
Canadian Business Publications is offering to the public a revised edition of the Canadian Subsidy Directory, a guide containing more than 3000 direct and indirect financial subsidies, grants and loans offered by government departments and agencies, foundations, associations and organizations.
In this new 2010 edition all programs are well described.
The Canadian Subsidy Directory is the most comprehensive tool to start up a business, improve existent activities, set up a business plan, or obtain ...
| Feb 20, 12:28 pm 2010 |
| Michael Dexter | OpenBSD Volunteer needed today in Los Angeles
OpenBSD has a booth at the SCaLE conference in Los Angeles and no one
appears to be available to staff it.
It's a great conference and I highly recommend someone drop by to staff
it Saturday and Sunday.
Where: LAX Westin hotel, 5400 W Century Blvd.
Call me for help with registration and orientation: 503-789-8978
Michael
| Feb 20, 12:19 pm 2010 |
| Kapetanakis Giannis |
| Feb 20, 8:48 am 2010 |
| Peter N. M. Hansteen |
| Feb 20, 6:25 am 2010 |
| Bret S. Lambert | [bret.lambert@gmail.com: Re: Filtering based on MAC adress]
Actually, it doesn't mention brconfig anymore (or is my memory
failing me, and it never did? quite possible)
In any case, sorry for the unneeded snark.
----- Forwarded message from "Bret S. Lambert" <bret.lambert@gmail.com> -----
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:42:42 +0100
From: "Bret S. Lambert" <bret.lambert@gmail.com>
To: Jean-Francois <jfsimon1981@gmail.com>
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Filtering based on MAC adress
PS - ifconfig also mentions brconfig, so you should probably have ...
| Feb 20, 5:45 am 2010 |
| Bret S. Lambert |
| Feb 20, 5:40 am 2010 |
| Bret S. Lambert |
| Feb 20, 5:42 am 2010 |
| Jean-Francois | Re: Filtering based on MAC adress
Hello Bret,
Can you please briefly explain the principle. I can see ifconfig(8) mentions
also that however it is still not clear.
I need to make a subnet with a local dhcp server and to filter on this side. I
believe I will do some NAT.
Regards.
| Feb 20, 5:19 am 2010 |
| Jean-Francois | Filtering based on MAC adress
Good morning,
Is it possible to do filtering through pf or blocking traffic based of MAC adress
recognition ?
We want to identify the machines on the internal network based on their MAC
adress and filter.
Can tools like pf fo this (not in my actual searches) ? another way ?
Regards
| Feb 20, 3:49 am 2010 |
| Bret S. Lambert |
| Feb 20, 4:21 am 2010 |
| Han Boetes | Re: Traffic control
You're a smart fellow, you'll figure out what this does.
# You don't want to miss you are CC-ed after all. You just don't
# want them in your maildir.
if ( /^(Cc|To).*(openbsd|misc|tech|bugs|gnats|source-changes)@/)
{
to $R/cc
}
# Han
| Feb 20, 7:51 am 2010 |
| Peter N. M. Hansteen | Re: Traffic control
ALTQ is part of PF these days (for quite some time, since OpenBSD 3.3
if memory serves), and yes, the code is kept up to date with the rest
of the system. The bits that make up this message passed at least one
system running with ALTQ enabled on its from me to you.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah ...
| Feb 20, 3:03 am 2010 |
| Rod Whitworth | Re: Traffic control
Will swim dingo?
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I <am> subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to reply off list. Thankyou.
Rod/
---
This life is not the real thing.
It is not even in Beta.
If it was, then OpenBSD would already have a man page for it.
| Feb 19, 10:21 pm 2010 |
| americano | Traffic control
Hello, Misc.
Will rewritten (updated and improved) implementation of the existing traffic
control system altq?
| Feb 19, 9:01 pm 2010 |
| Michiel van Baak |
| Feb 20, 2:31 am 2010 |
| Aidatsız araç takip | Gps takipte olay.!! Aidat yok.Abonelik y
T\RK]YE'N]N ARAG TAK]P AGILIMINI B]Z YAPIYORUZ.....
'']DDA ED]YORUZ DAHA UYGUN A]DATSIZ ve ABONEL]KS]Z S]STEM YOK....''
. Arag say}n}z ne olursa olsun, Aidat veya Abonman ad} alt}nda,
herhangi bir bedel al}nmamaktad}r.
. Firman}z} baplay}c} svzle~meler yapmayan T|rkiyedeki ilk ve tek
markad}r.
. T|rkiye'nin internet baplant}s} olmadan da gal}~an, ilk arag takip
sistemidir.
. Garanti s|resi 2 + 2 y}ld}r.Garanti kapsam}ndaki ar}za ...
| Feb 19, 7:51 pm 2010 |
| frantisek holop |
| Feb 20, 10:02 am 2010 |
| Darrin Chandler |
| Feb 20, 10:05 am 2010 |
| L. V. Lammert |
| Feb 20, 4:57 pm 2010 |
| Bret S. Lambert | Re: OT, .. but has anyone seen a crontab editor
Your original post[1] said, and I cut'n'paste, "that would be useable
for basic sysadmin types". How the fuck can anyone comprehend a question
you're incapable of asking correctly? I'm willing to bet that, somewhere,
a kindly old lady is crying into her afternoon tea because *you* didn't
pay any goddamn attention when she was trying to teach young Lee
how to clearly communicate a request to other people without turning
into a raving, entitled ass.
The Douche is strong with this one.
[1] ...
| Feb 20, 12:17 am 2010 |
| L. V. Lammert | Re: OT, .. but has anyone seen a crontab editor
Certainly not you, .. who, amongst others, are far more interested in
spouting crap than providing any useful information. Sometimes it's
amazing how vocal some people are, .. I guess we're lucky that thare are a
good bunch of folks out there more interested in creating good code tham
spouting bs.
Lee
| Feb 20, 9:49 am 2010 |
| Chris Dukes |
| Feb 19, 6:53 pm 2010 |
| Tobias Ulmer |
| Feb 20, 3:45 am 2010 |
| L. V. Lammert | Re: OT, .. but has anyone seen a crontab editor
Sorryk, my posts have been but a pittance in the BS spouted on this
thread, .. it's a shame that nobody bothered to reply with any useful
Guess you didn't read my original reply - but that's OK, I know it might
have been buried inthe crap.
Lee
| Feb 20, 9:51 am 2010 |
| Greg Thomas | Re: Dump levels ?
Just to confirm or unconfuse myself if you're doing dump 9s on Monday to
Thursday aren't you getting everything from the previous days each dump
rather than just the day before? I thought to get just the files changed on
a particular day you'd have to go:
Mon - dump 5
Tues - dump 6
Wed - dump 7
Thurs - dump 8
Fri - dump 4
--
Dethink to survive - Mclusky
| Feb 19, 8:44 pm 2010 |
| Jean-Francois | Re: Dump levels dump(8) man page clarification
Is it possible to clarify further this particular para of dump(8), I cant
understand the differences that are explained here between the nature of the
mount points and file systems and the relationship to what is prohibited (L+1
dumps are).
Thanks.
Regards
| Feb 20, 2:27 am 2010 |
| Laurens Vets |
| Feb 20, 3:31 am 2010 |
| Frank Bax | Re: Refusal to mention OpenBSD in a MSc Advanced Network ...
I did Algol-W, APL and SNOBOL (among others). I do not remember which
order. There was also group on campus working on a multi-platform OS
called THOTH written in Eh (but came after B and C appeared). I seem to
recall the third hardware was running this OS in about 8 hours.
| Feb 19, 5:57 pm 2010 |
| Chris Cappuccio |
| Feb 19, 5:57 pm 2010 |
