> PayPal's terms of use do not permit soliciting crime.
Paypal's terms of use are just that; terms of use. The account was
being run by the German charity WHS.
Noone has said that wikileaks has commited a crime. What statute
I hereby ask anyone who holds secrets that the world should know
of, which may contain indications of real crimes having been commited
should send them to wikileaks.
You think it should be a crime. You just justified skipping due process.
I hope that one day due process is denied you.
I am wondering what type of due process should be granted to these
individuals. What basis/jurisdiction of law are we talking about? Natural
human rights? US law? International Law? I'm just wondering because I think
it's critical to the whole discussion. Julian Assange isn't a US citizen so
the US Government probably feels justified doing whatever they want even if
it is "unethical", yet many think he should be protected by some of the US
justice code/process. Is due process universal?
If I kill a cow, should I be deported to India, and processed there for
that crime? (Note that in most parts of india, it IS a crime).
Oh, I live in Argentina, the largest exporter of cow-meat. Maybe we
should all be deported there.
--
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
That's why Americans call cowburgers hamburgers, for fear of
repercussions from the holy land. But seriously, re-incarnation takes
care of all that. Meaning, if you kill a cow in this life, you come back
as a cow and someone can kill you. It's the Indian version of an eye for
an eye.
Mehma
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:42:00 -0800
The percentage of people that (have to) kill their own food is so low
that nobody cares. Hamburgers are grown in the supermarket, hm'k?
This is Theo's list so he can say anything he likes,
but like any thread like this just stop feeding it.
This thread benefits no one. Not Theo. Not Wikileaks
Nobody.
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:42 -0700, "Theo de Raadt"
