> PayPal's terms of use do not permit soliciting crime.  Wikileaks
quoted text
> solicits the
> holders of US security clearances to violate their
> non-disclosure agreements. 
> That is a crime.

Soliciting crimes is criminal activity, and therefor to be acted upon needs to
be proved in court.

Untill one is found guilty by court, any public occusations against him are
considered defamation (criminal activity on it's own).

So, according to legal regulations PayPal's activity towards Wikileaks account
should be brought to court as a defamation case.

Again: if PayPal things Wikileaks to be engaged in criminal activity, it
should report such an activity (but not the details of such activity that
became known to PayPal dew to it's contract with Wikileaks) to entitled public
bodies and sit back waiting for a court's descision.

--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff