| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| m c | reboot command doesn't work
Hello all.
First time posting here, so I apologize in advance if my question doesn't
belong on this list.
I've been using some Compaq Deskpro DPENS Pentium II machines as OpenBSD
firewalls since late 2.x to early 3.x. Recently I made the jump to 4.8 and all
seems to work fine except I noticed the reboot command does not appear to
work. The machine gets halted, screen blanks out, but that's as far as it
goes. I re-installed 3.3 and confirmed the reboot works fine under 3.3.
Any tips/hints ...
| Dec 30, 4:56 pm 2010 |
| Ahlsen-Girard, Edwar ... | Re: microsoft.com -> NetBSD
It's almost New Year, so the times are collapsing into one another.
Ed Ahlsen-Girard
| Dec 30, 2:58 pm 2010 |
| Christopher Ahrens | Re: microsoft.com -> NetBSD
License file is incomplete, */ is missing off the end. Obviously you
haven't seen the BSD license before.
Also, please fix your time. It is one hour off and causing my mail
client to show your messages in the wrong order; meaning that I see
responses to your questions before the question.
--
-Christopher Ahrens
-LeviaComm Networks
| Dec 30, 1:24 pm 2010 |
| rancor | Dec 30, 12:58 pm 2010 | |
| Orestes Leal R. | Re: microsoft.com -> NetBSD
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
| Dec 30, 1:25 pm 2010 |
| S Mathias | Dec 30, 11:12 am 2010 | |
| Martin Schröder | Re: microsoft.com -> NetBSD
Maybe _your_ time, but Cuba isn't at UTC -6 but UTC -5.
| Dec 30, 2:18 pm 2010 |
| Orestes Leal R. | Re: microsoft.com -> NetBSD
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:24:25 -0600, Christopher Ahrens
My time it's ok.
| Dec 30, 3:00 pm 2010 |
| Ted Unangst | Re: microsoft.com -> NetBSD
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Orestes Leal R.
Your email says:
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:00:11 -0600
That's in the future.
I think cuba is supposed to be -0500, but you're some sort of "rogue"
nation, so who knows. :)
| Dec 30, 2:21 pm 2010 |
| Johan Fredin | Re: Another carp problem.
test to see if carp and pfsync works, I get this issue: fw master works, all
network connection works, then I disconnect che external interface cable of
fw1 and carp0 go in INIT, carp1 in BACKUP and carp2 in BACKUP, on fw 2, carp0,
carp1 and carp2 become MASTER. After 5/10 seconds, always with cable
disconnected, the carp0 of firewall 1 is in INIT, carp1 and carp2 return to
MASTER, and on fw2 the carp0 is MASTER and carp1, carp2 become BACKUP, and
each 5/10 seconds fw1: carp0 INIT carp1 MASTER ...
| Dec 30, 12:43 pm 2010 |
| Alessandro Baggi | Re: Another carp problem.
Hi Johan. Thanks for the reply, I've already tried to set on each
firewall net.inet.carp.preempt=1 and the problem is the same. Now I've
tried to set them to 0, and seems to work. My question is, why setting
up each firewall net.inet.carp.preempt to 1 it does not work?
On OpenBSD faq:
net.inet.carp.preempt
Allow hosts within a redundancy group that have a better advbase and
advskew to preempt the master. In addition, this option also enables
failing over a group of interfaces ...
| Dec 30, 3:01 pm 2010 |
| Alessandro Baggi | Another carp problem.
Hi list. I've installed two firewall, 1 master and 1 backup. Trying some
test to see if carp and pfsync works, I get this issue: fw master works,
all network connection works, then I disconnect che external interface
cable of fw1 and carp0 go in INIT, carp1 in BACKUP and carp2 in BACKUP,
on fw 2, carp0, carp1 and carp2 become MASTER. After 5/10 seconds,
always with cable disconnected, the carp0 of firewall 1 is in INIT,
carp1 and carp2 return to MASTER, and on fw2 the carp0 is MASTER and ...
| Dec 30, 11:58 am 2010 |
| Lucia | Annunci-01
Se non visualizzi bene il messaggio clica qui
rimuovi mio indirizzo
| Dec 30, 6:17 am 2010 |
| Gregory Edigarov | Re: reasoning behind default primary group being user
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:19:36 +0900
adduser will do the work for you.
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
| Dec 30, 4:50 am 2010 |
| Ted Unangst | Re: reasoning behind default primary group being user
I'm not sure if your use of "user" means "same as username" or
"users". There is no "user" group.
By default, I think we intend for a new user to get a new group, but
there's been some confusion in that department.
| Dec 30, 10:54 am 2010 |
| Gregory Edigarov | Re: reasoning behind default primary group being user
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:50:26 +0200
or try:
group =uid in /etc/usermgmt.conf, and read usermgmt.conf(5).
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
| Dec 30, 4:59 am 2010 |
| Joel Rees | reasoning behind default primary group being user
I noticed when the installer created my first non-root (erg, first administration) user, it set the primary group to "user", and not even to "staff".
Later, I added a non-wheel user and it set the primary group there to "user", as well. So I checked around and found, in usermgmt.conf, that the group "user" is specified as the default.
My memory is that this is a change from the last time I experimented with obsd, circa v3.4 or so.
A quick google search of the FAQ, the web and of the ...
| Dec 30, 4:19 am 2010 |
| PowerTech | HI,misc:善用Voip無限致電全中港!
Having problems viewing this email? Please click here.For enquiry, please send email to powertech@epromotion.com.hk
e&g!f3i1h.d;%d8ge'e.9o<h+f f-$.e&f d;;d=f%h)"h+i;i5h3 powertech@epromotion.com.hk
e&ff(d8f3ef6e0fegd?!d;6o<h+f ih#ie.
Important Notice: Base on the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Ordinance, if you DO NOT want to receive any promotional email messages from us in the future, please kindly reply this e-mail for DELETION. If you would ...
| Dec 29, 8:40 pm 2010 |
| SJP Lists | Re: spamd in a cloud setup?
Ah yes, true. Spoke too soon! Appologies!
| Dec 29, 9:16 pm 2010 |
| Markus Hennecke | Re: 4.8 breaks ral (hostap) for me too
For me this fixed the issue:
cvs up -D 2010/08/01 sys/dev/ic/rt2661* sys/dev/pci/if_ral_pci.c
The commit breaking it was dated 2010/08/04, just in case someone wants
to investigate. But since it is working in current I don't see much
sense doing that.
HTH
Markus
| Dec 30, 6:19 am 2010 |
| Ted Unangst | Re: 1gbit LAN/NIC performance, queue speed bug?
I forget if the profile counts interrupts as coming from idle. If
you're mostly forwarding traffic, the idle loop will be the top
function on the stack just about always.
| Dec 30, 10:47 am 2010 |
| RLW | Re: 1gbit LAN/NIC performance, queue speed bug?
although kernel profiling stats show that system spends 80% time in
idle, top during the iperf test shows:
load averages: 0.40, 0.16, 0.11 15:43:02
27 processes: 1 running, 25 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states: 0.6% user, 0.0% nice, 77.6% system, 21.8% interrupt, 0.0%
idle
Memory: Real: 10M/83M act/tot Free: 402M Swap: 0K/759M used/tot
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU COMMAND
i dont know that is TBR, but can I do something with it??
best ...
| Dec 30, 6:47 am 2010 |
| Claudio Jeker | Re: 1gbit LAN/NIC performance, queue speed bug?
From the porfile output.
index %time self descendents called+self name index
[1] 83.9 0.00 359.49 sched_idle [1]
You spent > 80% in idle. So while forwarding all that traffic the box was
mostly idle.
Interesting are:
[6] 3.3 0.02 14.26 4028087 acpi_get_timecount [6]
[7] 3.2 0.14 13.66 3854116 binuptime [7]
I guess these are that high up in the profile because of altq.
These seem to be altq ...
| Dec 30, 6:36 am 2010 |
| RLW | Re: 1gbit LAN/NIC performance, queue speed bug?
Hello again ;)
I finaly had time to do kernel profiling.
So we have:
- default OpenBSD 4.8 install
- em0 nic (at pci express slot)
- default sysctl
- definition of queue in pf.conf:
altq on em0 cbq bandwidth 1Gb queue { q_lan }
queue q_lan bandwidth 950Mb cbq (default)
- low speed between Linux Debian box (as iperf server) and OpenBSD box
(as iperf client):
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 41.0-42.0 sec 17.1 MBytes 144 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval Transfer ...
| Dec 30, 5:51 am 2010 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| December 29, 2010 | December 30, 2010 | December 31, 2010 |
