Re: reasoning behind default primary group being user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ted Unangst
Date: Thursday, December 30, 2010 - 10:54 am

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Joel Rees <joel_rees@sannet.ne.jp> wrote:

I'm not sure if your use of "user" means "same as username" or
"users".  There is no "user" group.

By default, I think we intend for a new user to get a new group, but
there's been some confusion in that department.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
reasoning behind default primary group being user, Joel Rees, (Thu Dec 30, 4:19 am)
Re: reasoning behind default primary group being user, Gregory Edigarov, (Thu Dec 30, 4:50 am)
Re: reasoning behind default primary group being user, Gregory Edigarov, (Thu Dec 30, 4:59 am)
Re: reasoning behind default primary group being user, Ted Unangst, (Thu Dec 30, 10:54 am)
Re: reasoning behind default primary group being user, patrick keshishian, (Thu Dec 30, 11:59 pm)
Re: reasoning behind default primary group being user, Alexander Hall, (Sat Jan 1, 12:09 pm)