[IMAGE]*Los precio estan expresados en pesos argentinos e incluye IVA. En caso de no querer recibir mas este correo por favor presione AQUI .

Matthew Sullenberger <sully () sadburger ! com> wrote at 2010-12-21 I don't think you will find many here who will not recommend against **ever** running **any** firewall as a hosted application in the strongest terms. It is probably the very worst application of all to run in a virtual machine. This is because the one machine that you leaving wholly exposed to attack is the ESXi host that the firewall is on: everything has to come through it to get to the "firewall" machine in the first ...

I've been playing with OpenBSD for a little while now, and really love it when I need to throw together a quick firewall, web server, dhcp server, etc. I've got on firewall that I've been using for a little while now, OpenBSD 4.6, running on a VMWare ESXi box. It normally performs fine, and it is doing some NAT and firewall functions with PF. I've pushed quite a few packets through it and am impressed with the performance I am able to get out of it. However, it seems like roughly every 2-3 ...

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Indunil Jayasooriya cvsup is ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = i386, but there is csup, see <http://marc.info/?t=125763073100002&r=1&w=2>. Rune

Hi List, I installed OpenBSD 64 bit. I want to update it by using cvsup.But, I am not able to find a *cvsup* 64 bit pkg . But, There is a 32 bit pkg available at below location. * ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.8/packages/i386/cvsup-16.1hp2-no_x11.tgz *Since it can NOT be installed on 64 bit, could You pls let me know where can I download a 64 bit cvsup pkg? Hope to hear from you. * * -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya

some comment? http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2010/Dec/200 -- -------------- Fernando Quintero http://nonroot.blogspot.com/ Just a nonroot User

If you were to do routing, and wanted to use a seperate block of addresses (from 192.168.1.0/24), besides the Linux box's config, and the OpenBSD box's config, you'd have to modify the configuration in 192.168.1.0/24 's router with static routes to the OpenBSD box (most SOHO routers don't support this). If you were to try to use some addresses under the 192.168.1.0/24 block, you'd have to either add a In my opinion, bridging is the most efficient way of accomplishing the task (getting acccess to ...

Don't set a netmask on your default route. You're adding a route for usb0 Shows up right there on the "default" line. A default route should have a Genmask of 0.0.0.0 (says so in the man page). All the IRB/CRB nonsense is just distracting. -- Jon

Do you need it in Braille? Couple of people said to you what to do. Use raw device and not block device. Is it so hard to read man page for newfs to see that in DESCRIPTION part? On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Orestes Leal R.

On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:25:35 -0600 *sigh* you have been told what is wrong before, but lets end this. "newfs /dev/sd1a" was wrong but was handled gracefully. and it is still wrong but now it bombs out. newfs works on raw devices. raw devices start with 'r'. the right command simply is "newfs /dev/rsd1a". ^ now that it was spelled out, it might be easier for you to read up on this in the manpages.

This was the procedure I follow in 4.3 sucessfully, the same I did in 4.8 and doesn't work: -bash-3.2# fdisk -i sd1 ----------------------------------------------------- ------ ATTENTION - UPDATING MASTER BOOT RECORD ------ ----------------------------------------------------- Do you wish to write new MBR and partition table? [n] MBR is unchanged -bash-3.2# fdisk -i sd1 ----------------------------------------------------- ------ ATTENTION ...

newfs /dev/rsd1a

Otto, this is not 4.8 it's 4.3, so this is a error now and not a warning, what I must changte in the comnand line to make it work with 4.8? -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

On 20 December 2010 23:28, Kenneth R Westerback <kwesterback@rogers.com> The plot thickens! I plug the Brother into a Billion ADSL router and it acquires its subnet mask just fine :-O So, short of inserting a transparent bridge between the Brother and the Billion and logging the ethernet frames passing through the bridge, is there any other way of seeing what's going on here? If not then I've an OpenBSD bridge to install... Looking forward to your response, I was convinced it was just a ...

It may be interesting to know of any specifics tweaks in that setup According to pf_var.h, a struct pf_state is roughly 212 bytes on amd64.