login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
openbsd-misc
»
2010
»
November
»
9
Re: FFS compatibility sparc64 vs alpha vs i386
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Christian Weisgerber
Subject:
Re: FFS compatibility sparc64 vs alpha vs i386
Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010 - 11:46 am
Christiano F. Haesbaert <haesbaert@haesbaert.org> wrote:
quoted text
> I'm pretty sure that can't be done in i386 since the endianess is > different, but alpha shares the same one.
alpha is little-endian like i386.
quoted text
> Searching through the archives it seems FFS is indeed endianess > dependent, is there any other incompatibility ?
The disk labels. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
naddy@mips.inka.de
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
FFS compatibility sparc64 vs alpha vs i386
, Christiano F. Haesbaert
, (Tue Nov 9, 9:54 am)
Re: FFS compatibility sparc64 vs alpha vs i386
, Marco Peereboom
, (Tue Nov 9, 10:35 am)
Re: FFS compatibility sparc64 vs alpha vs i386
, Ted Unangst
, (Tue Nov 9, 11:14 am)
Re: FFS compatibility sparc64 vs alpha vs i386
, Christian Weisgerber
, (Tue Nov 9, 11:46 am)
Re: FFS compatibility sparc64 vs alpha vs i386
, Christiano F. Haesbaert
, (Tue Nov 9, 12:55 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
monstr
[PATCH 46/56] microblaze_v2: headers files entry.h current.h mman.h registers.h se...
Jan Engelhardt
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
Dave Jones
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
Michael Moore
Re: underage models, pre teen models, lolita porn, young preteens, little lolitas
Lars-Peter Clausen
[PATCH v4] MMC: Add JZ4740 mmc driver
git
:
Andy Parkins
git-fetch fails with error code 128
Eli Zaretskii
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
Jan Harkes
Re: git-svn and huge data and modifying the git-svn-HEAD branch directly
Dan Chokola
Re: how do you "force a pull"?
Johan Herland
Re: Comment on weak refs
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, msr: Export the register-setting MSR functions via /dev/*/msr
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: SMTC: Fix lockup in smtc_distribute_timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Input: gpio-keys - add support for disabling gpios through sysfs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sh-sci: update receive error handling for muxed irqs
linux-netdev
:
Patrick McHardy
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket
Ilpo Järvinen
net-next/unix: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
Herbert Xu
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Evgeniy Polyakov
Re: virt-manager broken by bind(0) in net-next.
Eric Dumazet
Re: [PATCH] conntrack: use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU for nf_conn structs
openbsd-misc
:
elitdostlar
Seks partneri arayan bayanlar bu adreste - 8878xs706x6438
Marcus Andree
Re: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Lars D. Noodén
Re: sshd.config and AllowUsers
Henning Brauer
Re: Sun Blade 1000?
Laurens Vets
Re: OT: opinions on IDS / IPS solutions
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate