login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
openbsd-misc
»
2010
»
November
»
23
Re: em(4) detailed errors
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Otto Moerbeek
Subject:
Re: em(4) detailed errors
Date: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 - 8:02 am
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
quoted text
> Hi, > > On Thu, 18.11.2010 at 16:38:55 +0100, Manuel Guesdon <ml+openbsd.misc@oxymium.net> wrote: > > Is there a way to get detailed em(4) device errors without having to > > recompile kernel with EM_DEBUG ? > > I try to find in-errors reason(s) but netstat only gives errors as a sum of > > dropped_pkts + stats.rxerrc + stats.crcerrs + sc->stats.algnerrc +... as far > > as I can see :-( > > I'm having a similar problem. On one 4x em(4) machine, I get a lot of > input errors and, much more serious, intermittend packet loss, but only > on one interface out of two with similar traffic levels (~1-4kpps per > direction). > > After reading the latest em(4) threads, I also found this very strange > thing, which must have been automatically configured: > > # ifconfig em3 > em3: > flags=8b43<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > lladdr 00:30:48:94:0b:21 > priority: 0 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex,master) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > status: active > > > I'm unsure about how to remove this feature from this (physical) > interface, and the machine uses none of carp, pfsync or sasync. > The hardware for this interface is
I would rather investigate why the PROMISC and ALLMULTI flags are set on this interface. -Otto
quoted text
> > em3 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82573L)" rev 0x00: apic 2 int 17 (irq 11), address 00:30:48:94:0b:21 > > as detected by OpenBSD 4.8-stable (i386). > > The ability to selectively enable or disable debugging for individual > devices at runtime would be a great feature, from a sysadmin's > perspective. > > > -- > Kind regards, > --Toni++
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
em(4) detailed errors
, Manuel Guesdon
, (Thu Nov 18, 8:38 am)
Re: em(4) detailed errors
, Toni Mueller
, (Tue Nov 23, 7:16 am)
Re: em(4) detailed errors
, Claudio Jeker
, (Tue Nov 23, 7:49 am)
Re: em(4) detailed errors
, Otto Moerbeek
, (Tue Nov 23, 8:02 am)
Re: em(4) detailed errors
, Ted Unangst
, (Tue Nov 23, 9:07 am)
Re: em(4) detailed errors
, Toni Mueller
, (Tue Nov 23, 1:33 pm)
Re: em(4) detailed errors
, Stuart Henderson
, (Wed Nov 24, 3:00 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Mathieu Desnoyers
[PATCH 01/10] local_t : architecture independant extension
monstr
[PATCH 46/56] microblaze_v2: headers files entry.h current.h mman.h registers.h se...
Ingo Molnar
Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3
Jan Engelhardt
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
Dave Jones
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
linux-netdev
:
jamal
[net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/7] xfrm: introduce basic mark infrastructure
jamal
[net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/7] xfrm by MARK
Grant Coady
Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
Matt Mackall
Re: [regression] nf_iterate(), BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
Jeff Garzik
Re: [PATCH 1/5] sky2: phy setup changes
git
:
Andy Parkins
git-fetch fails with error code 128
Eli Zaretskii
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
Johannes Sixt
Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Teach rebase interactive the mark command
Dan Chokola
Re: how do you "force a pull"?
Steffen Prohaska
Re: [msysGit] Re: [PATCH 12/12] [TODO] setup: bring changes from 4msysgit/next to ...
openbsd-misc
:
Ashraf Cotu
Je sur comptable a la banque BCB je vais virée $6.million a la etranger
ropers
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
Pawlowski Marcin Piotr
Re: current on HP EliteBook 8530w
Tony Abernethy
Re: The Atheros story in much fewer words
S H
Re: Short thank you and gratitude note for constant OpenBSD improvements/evolutions!
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, msr: Export the register-setting MSR functions via /dev/*/msr
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: SMTC: Fix lockup in smtc_distribute_timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Input: gpio-keys - add support for disabling gpios through sysfs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] 5562/2: at91: add gpio button support for at91sam9g20ek
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate