Re: spamd -G whiteexp not honored?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Henning Brauer
Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 - 5:20 am

* Boudewijn Dijkstra <boudewijn@indes.com> [2010-11-02 12:18]:

that should be changed, last not least so that db manipulations (not
just whitelisting of course) by spamdb are being synced to the other
nodes by spamd.
someone has to do that, tho...

-- 
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: spamd -G whiteexp not honored?, Boudewijn Dijkstra, (Tue Nov 2, 4:09 am)
Re: spamd -G whiteexp not honored?, Daniel Perup, (Tue Nov 2, 4:40 am)
Re: spamd -G whiteexp not honored?, Henning Brauer, (Tue Nov 2, 5:20 am)