I upgraded to a more current snapshot the other day and after fsck ran on the root partition, it asked if i wanted to fsck the other partitions. I typed "no", but it ran anyways, causing a failure and therefore aborting the install because some disks were missing. I have 2 usb hard drives in my /etc/fstab. I don't have these drives with me all the time, and had them unplugged during my upgrade (so i didn't inadvertently install to one of them). I tried to upgrade a couple times, but i ...

Agora ficou facil ter website. AC6 - preparou a solugco perfeita para vocj! veja nossa apresentagco abaixo.

I've used RFC1918 addresses for each on the WAN facing NICs and let carp assign the global IP to whichever one should have it. That let me access the individual hosts from the LAN. You may want that some times.... *** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I <am> subscribed to the list. Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to reply off list. Thankyou. Rod/ --- This life is not the real ...

Hello guys, im writing this to let you know about the problems that im facing with my toshiba satellite lapto and a pcmcia ethernet card based on the realtek chip 8139. Well i just want to build a new router box based on 4.8 (tried 4.7 too) so i just bought this card to use as the wan interface of the config. The problems came when i plug the card and this message appear: pcic_chip_socket_enable: status c pcic_wait_ready: ready never happened, status = 0c com3 at pcmcia0 funtion 0: can't ...

Three is nice, but only one on the CARP interface is necessary. -Steve S.

Thanks, Steve. What can one then use for the IP addresses for the $ext_if of the firewalls? In the example in the Book of PF2 I referenced before, the carp0 address is 192.0.2.19, with 192.0.2.17 and 192.0.2.18 assigned to the external interfaces of the firewalls. Ryan McBrides "Firewall Failover with pfsync and CARP" linked to in the FAQ entry on CARP also doesn't use routable IPs. I don't think Bresnan is going to take kindly to me just grabbing a couple of IPs next to my ...

Hi Guys, Doing a small disk benchmark in my laptop with dd, I found that dd and iostats were reporting different numbers. To be precise, iostat was returning half of the MB/sec than dd (24.5 vs 49 MB/sec). Digging a bit on the iostat code, I realized that the "struct _disk" cpu time was returning 200 timer ticks even though it was read every second. I tested by booting my machine with bsd.sp (to use one core instead of two) and now it was returning the right number. It seems like the ...

Good luck Felipe, a friend of mine had a V40z... when he switched it on it seemed to me like a plane taking off :DDDDD ....btw, he has sold it for 300b, to guys who deployed it in a rack, he couldn't stand it anymore :)))) For the rest, well, that was a *machine* 2 dual core opterons.... 8GB ram... lotsa power indeed! Have phun with ur new little monster :))) Ciao On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Felipe Mesquita de Oliveira <

:) Actually the air isn't hot... Even in the front dysplay, navigating it, the temps are really low... around 28c... I'll check the BIOS version tonight... Of course I don't wanna burn the CPU's, but the more fan works (maybe, un-necessarily), the more energy is being spend... If it could be optimized, Why NOT? []'s, Felipe On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Timo Schoeler

Even if you get the file it wont "fix" what your hoping for. If anything I think the newer firmwares have higher fan rpm settings... Basically you looking at 2 realistic settings with this system. Really loud while the OS is running and insanely loud when its powering up/down under only the SP/BIOS control. That's just the way they are.

Si tus ventas estan bien no aminores el paso, reivintate y acelera para estar azn mejor. !Reinventarse es una cuestisn de supervivencia ya que las buenas rachas pueden cambiar en cualquier momento!. POR ESO TOMA EN CUENTA LOS SIGUIENTES BENEFICIOS DE APROVECHAR ESTA PROMOCION DE PAGINA DE INTERNET: 1. Con una inversisn de solo $3990.00 pesos ahora en promocisn de $ 2990 pesos en un znico pago ($238 dslares USD), hacemos que a ...

Sorry, no way. 802.1X authentication is currently unsupported on OpenBSD. ciao, david

We don't see any emails? We had some delays with UPS. All orders have been shipped. If you contact me off list I'll look to see whats going on.

Strange i send two emails, and two messages by the forms. it is the order 454 Thanks

... And is a fraudster and a criminal paulm

My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced, most probably with one of these newer smartphones. Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible: a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed to install obsd on some of these newer phones? I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically a modified linux; does anyone know about a varinat that would have an OS based on ...

Obvious troll is obvious. -- Worse is better Richard P. Gabriel

The most open phone I'm aware of is Nokia N900. It runs Maemo, and can run full blown Debian, AFAIK. Never heard of anyone running OpenBSD on one, but perhaps it is possible? I'm assuming it would take some hacking, though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N900 I'd like to play with one at some point, but I'm a little too broke for that at the moment.

Yes, and we won't be supporting any obsolete platforms around here. On Nov 17, 2010 8:34 AM, "Francesco Vollero" <raven@lilik.it> wrote:

No. Also, compare the user interface and applications useful on a Android and Maemo are Linux-based. Symbian, iOS, Bada, Blackberry Apple's iOS is the most BSD-ish. But that is utterly closed, and the iPhone is dongled to the proprietary iTunes program (Mac OS, MS Windows). -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de

Ask Theo about Mr. Vandeputte. :-) Oh, and if you believe http://accounting.kd85.com/ , read the list archives. Best Martin

Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously obsolete.

kerberos is 3rd party maintained. please download a current version of their source, verify whether the fix is still needed, and mail them at heimdal-bugs@pdc.kth.se if it is. jmc

connection. Make sure you are setting both sides to 100-full or you will end up in a duplex mismatch. -B

netperf just gives 1,12 MB/s, independent of the remote machine. Jochen Fabricius

I was afraid of that. Is there anything I could do, maybe send some more information (which?) for solving these issues? Jochen Fabricius <jfabricius@web.de>

Hello, I see, that while I am testing network speed by iperf, 100% CPU is being used, but is that normal for default install of OpenBSD 4.8 with default pf.conf?? I have second computer exactly like that one (IBM ThinkCentre A51P), on which i am running this tests but with P4 3Ghz CPU 2mb cache (not celeron 2.8) and the same is happening (100% CPU). LAN interface is Intel PRO/1000 PT Desktop Adapter (PCIe, model: EXPI9300PTBLK) and this is the only pcie adapter in computer (maybe ...

ok, a set qlimit to 200 and then 500, no difference queue root_em0 on em0 bandwidth 1Gb priority 0 qlimit 500 cbq( wrr root ) {q_lan} [ pkts: 858820 bytes: 1300055838 dropped pkts: 0 bytes: 0 ] [ qlength: 0/500 borrows: 0 suspends: 0 ] [ measured: 29222.9 packets/s, 353.90Mb/s ] queue q_lan on em0 bandwidth 950Mb qlimit 500 cbq( borrow default ) [ pkts: 858820 bytes: 1300055838 dropped pkts: 0 bytes: 0 ] [ qlength: 0/500 ...

Thanks for all the answers, but the problem still exists. To sum up: OpenBSD 4.8 default install cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.80 GHz npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16 em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000 PT (82572EI)" rev 0x06: apic 1 int 16 (irq 5), address XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX 1. - tcp send and receive window @ default - pf disabled - transfer speed on em0 tested by iperf: 458 Mbits/sec - top shows: load ...

Thanks. I've performed some other testing and found other clients work acceptably, so I'll assume it's an ESXi issue. Iperf tops out at 300 Mbps on my network, which sucks but it's better than the 50 Mbps NFS was doing. I'll try upgrading to 4.1 this weekend and see if that helps. -Steve S.