This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message correctly.

Hi, How do some of you deal with removing libc.so.53.0, libc.so.54.0, libc.so.55.0, libc.so.56.0, libc.so.57.0 etc in /usr/lib? I have to compile a package whose configure is built only to recognize gmake and is compiled against specific number of .so file. so I periodically go in /usr/lib and sort and clean carefully. Thanks

Good article. "Stealth" mode is highly overrated. I generally use return except in the case of bogons.

OK. That makes sense, but all inbound traffic is dropped... so while all outbound traffic on any interface is permitted, and inbound traffic is passed... or does the combination of this rule and and my 'block in log' rule not provide this behavior? It is my understanding that you can block on an interface in one of two directions: either the inbound traffic or the outbound traffic. The result should be the same either way right? You either block the inbound traffic of a connection or you ...

Yep exactly... Check this: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~peterb/network/drop-vs-reject

(please see my in-line comments) The ????? marks are just replacements for the actual port number. This rule should forward outside traffic from port ????? to the SSH server but I think you are probably on the right track. I really don't understand the new rdr-to and match nat-to rules as well as the older pre 4.6 syntax. However, if I comment that rule out, an nmap still shows a bunch open ports. If I try manually connecting to one of the ports that are listed as open by nmap I get a ...

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:52 PM, stolendata.net Yes, it's a known problem with table of associated clients not being refreshed properly in our 802.11 stack. For what I know, some dev should be working on fixing it... ciao, david

I've been using the RAL(4) driver and a wifi card with the RT2561 chipset (Linksys WMP54g) for a few years as my wifi access point, and have had no problems at all. Recently I switched to an 802.11n card with RT2860 chipset (Edimax EW-7728in) in hopes of getting some higher transfer speeds to my server storage, only to find out that OpenBSD's 802.11 stack doesn't have any 11n functionality at all and thusly runs as 11g only. Since I switched to using the RT2860 chipset, first on obsd 4.3 and ...

From: Michal <michal () sharescope ! co ! uk> I have run OpenBSD in production on both VMWare server and ESXi. It was the only machine facing the Internet that the auditors had no findings on. -- Edward Ahlsen-Girard Ft Walton Beach, FL

Humm. I thought that I used upgrade48.html, but now that I think of it I was doing a couple of systems and uname -a confirms that I didn't do the box I'm building on! Thanks for the cluestick and sorry for the trouble. Karl <kop@meme.com> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein

destinos [IMAGE] Si ya no deseas recibir este newsletter, date de baja aqui.

Hi, I just upgraded from 4.7-stable to 4.8-stable and tried to rebuild the GENERIC i386 kernel and 'make depend' failed. Figuring that maybe I'd done something wrong updating the source with cvs I tried removing /usr/src and replacing it with the 4.8 tarballs and I had the same problem. Here's the output: ----------------<snip>------------ # cd /sys/arch/i386/conf # config GENERIC Don't forget to run "make depend" # cd ../compile/GENERIC/ # make clean rm -f eddep *bsd *bsd.gdb tags ...

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:09:05 -0800 (PST) Deleted or overwritten, If it's deleted then lookup testdisk, if that fails you'll need some forensic tools (plenty) and a bit more patience. Make sure using your system doesn't make that area of the disk get overwritten?

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:09:19 -0700 (MST) Diana Eichert Diana, You might want to give Portwell (in the US) a call: 1-510-403-3399 jcr

I say, I'll re-read the datasheet. (sorry) -- Renato dos Santos shazaum.wordpress.com

[moving from misc to tech@, reply-to set] okay... at first I was having problems reproducing this, until I hit the machine with a large bunch of *incoming* packets by running netblast on a faster box. to repeat this I am doing: - boot the re(4) box, configure IP addresses, systat mbuf .1 - on a faster machine, pkg_add netrate, netblast $netbook_ip_addr 5 10 (5=packet size, 10=run for 10 seconds) the following diff reverts MCLGETI for re(4) which stops the freezes for me. unless there ...

On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:06:45 -0600 I've heard of people not even getting past the install even with a Yeah I used to edit the configs manually but things have changed there is now a more capable UI with the free vmware player than virtual box (ignoring the pretty nifty auto focus grab in virtualbox), the only missing thing being you need workstation for 3d support whereas virtualbox has free experimental 3d support. To me it's a bit like a blackberry, I'll play with it but would you trust ...

I can confirm that OpenBSD doesn't always work as a virtual machine. So I would focus on using OpenBSD as the host and using some other OS as a client in QEMU.

This might help with full disc encryption: - http://16s.us/OpenBSD/softraid.txt - man softraid - man bioctl Obviously, windows can't read anything. I can, of course, write, or delete you data. The best penetration testing is though two physical computers, to better simulate real conditions. OpenBSD doesn't run properly on VirtualBox (it does install on the latest version), and I belive virtualization is not really supported. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

On VirtualBox this is probably more to do with the dynamic image size. You have to create the disk image as a fixed size in order to complete the install. After that it works fine. -Bryan

Latest version is the same, had a friend trying to use it last month. Same random segfaults everywhere. virtualbox is indeed a piece of crap.