login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
openbsd-misc
»
2010
»
November
»
11
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Tor Houghton
Subject:
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables
Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010 - 4:06 am
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:32:27PM +0900, Ryan McBride wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:45:16PM +0100, Tor Houghton wrote: > > May I ask whether or not "per user" ownership (or permission to update) a > > table is/will be possible? > > > > I am pondering the best mechanism for a non-root process to add/remove > > addresses to a table. > > You can look at sysutils/tabled in ports, which provides this > functionality (permissions would be controlled by the filesystem > permissions on the fifo) > > I don't think we'll be making /dev/pf accessible by non-root processes > any time soon.
This looks exactly like what I need. Thank you! Kind regards, Tor
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: nfsv4?
, James A. Peltier
, (Thu Oct 28, 11:15 am)
Re: nfsv4?
, Henning Brauer
, (Thu Oct 28, 11:25 pm)
(Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables
, Tor Houghton
, (Wed Nov 10, 5:45 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables
, Bret S. Lambert
, (Wed Nov 10, 5:53 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables
, Thomas Jeunet
, (Wed Nov 10, 7:50 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables
, Ryan McBride
, (Thu Nov 11, 1:32 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables
, Tor Houghton
, (Thu Nov 11, 4:06 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables
, Dennis Davis
, (Thu Nov 11, 5:24 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Christoph Lameter
[PATCH 1/2] Make page->private usable in compound pages V1
Luben Tuikov
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Alexey Dobriyan
Re: [2.6.22.2 review 09/84] Fix rfkill IRQ flags.
Michal Nazarewicz
Re: [PATCH] USB: Gadget: g_multi: added INF file for gadget with multiple configur...
Jesse Barnes
Re: PCI probing changes
git
:
Jakub Narebski
Re: GSoC 2008 - Mentors Wanted!
Jan Harkes
Re: git-svn and huge data and modifying the git-svn-HEAD branch directly
Andy Parkins
git-fetch fails with error code 128
Marcus Griep
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Git.pm: Add faculties to allow temp files to be cached
Junio C Hamano
Re: [JGIT PATCH 2/2] Decrease the fetch pack client buffer to the lower minimum
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: 5970/1: nomadik-gpio: fix spinlock usage
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sh-sci: update receive error handling for muxed irqs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, msr: Export the register-setting MSR functions via /dev/*/msr
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Input: gpio-keys - add support for disabling gpios through sysfs
linux-netdev
:
Eric Dumazet
[PATCH] net: ALIGN/PTR_ALIGN cleanup in alloc_netdev_mq()/netdev_priv()
Patrick McHardy
[NET_SCHED]: sch_ingress: remove netfilter support
Rose, Gregory V
RE: __bad_udelay in network driver breaks build
Patrick McHardy
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket
Frans Pop
svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97).
openbsd-misc
:
ropers
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
elitdostlar
Seks partneri arayan bayanlar bu adreste - 8878xs706x6438
Marcus Andree
Re: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Lars D. Noodén
Re: sshd.config and AllowUsers
Henning Brauer
Re: Sun Blade 1000?
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate