Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ryan McBride
Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010 - 1:32 am

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:45:16PM +0100, Tor Houghton wrote:

You can look at sysutils/tabled in ports, which provides this
functionality (permissions would be controlled by the filesystem
permissions on the fifo)

I don't think we'll be making /dev/pf accessible by non-root processes
any time soon.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: nfsv4?, James A. Peltier, (Thu Oct 28, 11:15 am)
Re: nfsv4?, Henning Brauer, (Thu Oct 28, 11:25 pm)
(Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables, Tor Houghton, (Wed Nov 10, 5:45 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables, Bret S. Lambert, (Wed Nov 10, 5:53 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables, Thomas Jeunet, (Wed Nov 10, 7:50 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables, Ryan McBride, (Thu Nov 11, 1:32 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables, Tor Houghton, (Thu Nov 11, 4:06 am)
Re: (Perhaps?) dumb pf question relating to tables, Dennis Davis, (Thu Nov 11, 5:24 am)