On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:27:02PM +0000, Jay K wrote:
quoted text > You know, installing ports/packages often gives you random manual
> configuration advise, like:
>
>
> ===> Installing jdk-1.6.0.03p9 from /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/
> jdk-1.6.0.03p9:
> ok
>
> --- +jdk-1.6.0.03p9 -------------------
> You may wish to add /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/man to /etc/man.conf
> Use and distribution of this technology is subject to the Java Research
> License included herein.
>
> To use the Java plugin with Seamonkey or Firefox you must create
> a symbolic link (do not copy or hard link) from
>
> /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/jre/plugin/amd64/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so
>
> to your local Mozilla plugins directory, which is found at
>
> ~/.mozilla/plugins/
>
> or to the shared Mozilla plugins directory, which is found at
>
> /usr/local/lib/mozilla-plugins/
> =
>
>
> 1) There should be a way to repeat all these messages for all installed
> packages.
> Maybe there already is.
pkg_add <arguments> | tee pkg.out ??
quoted text >
>
> 2) Every time one of these is printed, the command that does #1 should be
> reported, possibly
> both for the specific packages, and all installed packages, or at least for
> all installed packages.
> (Don't make users remember what packages are installed or how to determine
> which are installed or which had the messages.)
Really, some sort of package log file is what you're asking for, and
I'm really not seeing a way that doesn't smack of creeping Linux-itus.
quoted text >
>
> 3) "You may wish to add /usr/local/jdk-1.6.0/man to /etc/man.conf" isn't
> descriptive enough, I think,
> in that, when I looked into it, I didn't know what edit to make so I gave up.
> It should give a command. For that matter, so should the others.
> The Python messages give you actual copy/pastable commands.
>
>
> 3b) Maybe there should be a way to automate that further. But I suppose
> besides being
> optional, these things are also somewhat changable by user? I don't know.
> The Python ones surely could be automatic, without the -f.
> (ln -sf /usr/local/bin/python26 python or such)
What if I'm developing in a split python 2.4/2.6 environment? Not saying
that you're wrong, just raising a reason why what works for you may not
be the best for everybody, or even the majority.
quoted text >
>
> - Jay
