Marco Peereboom wrote:
quoted text
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 01:08:25AM +0000, JC Choisy wrote:
>> That being out of the way, you got me wondering what good is
>> any integrity check which failure is OK.
> 
> It is only meant to help uptight people having some sort of false sense
> of integrity/security.  It really is for release only because snapshots
> are a moving target.  In my opinion the whole check is a giant waste of
> time because every damn time the snaps are out of sync for a reason or
> another people come whining to the list about something that is
> irrelevant.


Am I correct in assuming that the code before this integrity check is 
not able to distinguish between release and snapshot?