| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| fquinonez1 | Jan 1, 4:53 am 2010 | |
| Nick Guenther | Re: Web Browsers
Because Google's stated mission is to collect all the world's
information and "make it useful", whereas Mozilla's is to promote an
open web.
| Jan 1, 2:02 am 2010 |
| Hugo Osvaldo Barrera | Re: Web Browsers
Chrome/Chromium: stable, secure, but questioned privacy. I don't know
if anyone has gone though the *whole* code to actually check this
issue, since it *is* open source, so the privacy issue should be
something no-so-impossible to leave behind.
Firefox: might slow down on some sort of sites (heavy javascript,
etc). If on tab crashes, the whole thing goes down. Privacy a bit more
trustworthy than google, but not-so-stable and not-so-secure.
Chrome has no master password for remembered ...
| Jan 1, 12:40 am 2010 |
| Ted Unangst | Re: Web Browsers
Who pays for the majority of firefox's development?
| Jan 1, 1:27 pm 2010 |
| Theo de Raadt | Re: Web Browsers
Oh sorry, I forgot to think like an American for a second there.
(Change you can believe in, penny on the dollar)
| Jan 1, 2:13 am 2010 |
| Theo de Raadt | Re: Web Browsers
Why?
| Jan 1, 12:47 am 2010 |
| Bryan | Re: Web Browsers
Wait, wait... don't tell me...
| Jan 1, 2:40 pm 2010 |
| Andrej Elizarov | Re: Web Browsers
what's about srware iron?
| Jan 1, 12:51 pm 2010 |
| Nick Guenther | Re: Web Browsers
Ooooh right. Good point. Well, I wasn't meaning to make a fuss, just
filling in the rhetorical answer. Hugo just said "a bit" after all.
| Jan 1, 4:02 pm 2010 |
| Jacek Masiulaniec | Re: How to remove "Operation timed out" messages" from q ...
It would be interesting to see the exact smtpctl output, and the
exact smtpd.conf that was used.
| Jan 1, 8:00 am 2010 |
| Edd Barrett | Re: Sparc u5
That's the one!
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
| Jan 1, 11:51 am 2010 |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: testing a drive with dd -- odd results
not positive. I meant not positive.
| Jan 1, 7:39 am 2010 |
| David Gwynne | Re: testing a drive with dd -- odd results
id try this on a sili(4), ahci(4), or mpi(4) controller and see what happens.
my guess is you're hitting issues in the ata stack, specifically to do with
the block offsets of your io ops.
dlg
IDE, one of those 40GB (SATA) drives was in my workstation. The result is
basically the same: x number of bytes transferred, etc. with no problems.
They are all a few years old. I bought a brand-new Seagate Barracuda
SATA/1.5TB/7200/32MB, installed it into my workstation and ran the same test
3 ...
| Jan 1, 12:19 am 2010 |
| Denis Doroshenko | Re: differences in reported disk size (starring bioctl, ...
perhaps the same thing as the FAQ mentions:
Note that not all controllers and drivers support large disks. For
example, ami(4) has a limit of 2TB per logical volume. Many have just
sure everything works perfectly yet.
It is just a pity, that the man page does not contain this information.
still makes me wonder that disklabel displays correct number of
sectors and newfs seems to be able to address them. may be it is
better no to rely on this and just use smaller disks or RAID ...
| Jan 1, 3:19 pm 2010 |
| Otto Moerbeek | Re: differences in reported disk size (starring bioctl, ...
That is correct, initially, disklabel believes fdisk, which just isn't
I don't think an automatic switch is a good solution, imo people should
There is a big caveat to using filesystems this large, see the faq:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#LargeDrive
There's one inaccuracy here, amd64 systems should be able to allocate
up to 8G to a process, but you are entering untested territory here.
It's better to stay on the safe side, and not create filesystems that
are too large.
I ...
| Jan 1, 2:04 am 2010 |
| Jean-Francois | OpenBSD's Songs
Hello list,
I just would like to thank once the work around the songs and arts for the
project, it really is kind of awesome every-time, and is I believe, an
important part in the project.
Regards
| Jan 1, 4:33 am 2010 |
| Carl Trachte | Re: OpenBSD's Songs
The evolution of the fish was my favorite 4.6 sticker. Good times.
| Jan 1, 7:01 am 2010 |
| Peter N. M. Hansteen | Re: Hostap status no network
unfortunately iwi does not support hostap.
The drivers that do have a paragraph similar to this in their man pages:
Host AP In this mode the driver acts as an access point (base sta-
tion) for other cards.
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: ...
| Jan 1, 4:48 am 2010 |
| evangelos tsiaplas | Hostap status no network
Hello all, i am trying to configure a hostap access point with an OpenBSD 4.6
machine, everything *seems* fine (i can ping the address) but my status says
"no network". I have tried this on 2 different machines with 3 different
network adaptors, I have also tried with/out WPA and many different mode
options all with the same "no network" status. All 3 network adaptors are
working and in use daily.
# uname -a
OpenBSD megalos.inet.net 4.6 GENERIC#0 i386
$ more /etc/hostname.iwi0
inet ...
| Jan 1, 4:34 am 2010 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2009 | January 1, 2010 | January 2, 2010 |
