Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Sunday, July 5, 2009 - 5:37 pm

So far this thread has focused on the various IMAP based solutions and
the merits of the many alternate components to such. Keying off some
comments in the OP (below) I would like to point out that there _is_
an OpenBSD package openwebmail-2.51p1.tgz for a non-IMAP webmail. A few
of the things that I like about this solution are:
- it is written entirely in perl (no php or other non-base prereqs)
- it works well when deployed on the mail server or over POP3
- its interface is very clean yet fairly feature rich
- it is browser agnostic and renders decently even on mobiles

Again, I bring this up only because it seems to me that the original
goal was a simple non-IMAP solution and this suggestion should be taken
completely independent of the rest of this thread -- IMAP adds
capabilities and complexities that make any comparison of solutions
with and without it mostly invalid.

On 4 Jul 2009 at 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote:

> I have been running email for a couple of small domains for a few years

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on por..., Jacob L. Leifman, (Sun Jul 5, 5:37 pm)