+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:02:43PM -0700, John Brahy wrote:
| # newfs /dev/wd0f
| newfs: /dev/wd0f: block device
| #
|
| I thought that I have done that before. Have we lost functionality in
| 4.5 or just my mind?A bug that allowed newfs'ing block devices was fixed. We did not lose
functionality, we gained stability. Your perspective is skewed ;)The archives will tell you what could go wrong when running newfs on a
block device. Someone explained it very well, I believe it was otto@.Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Andi Kleen | Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: Possible regression in HTB |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
git: | |
