Hi Claudio and Misc@,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:12:09 +0700, Claudio Jeker <claudio@openbsd.org>  
wrote:

quoted text
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 08:37:22AM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:20:05 +0700, Claudio Jeker <claudio@openbsd.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Could you please run with the following diff and report if you still  
>>> hit
>>> the panics. It seems some drivers (maybe even em) fail to call the link
>>> state update function without the needed splsoftnet protection.
>>> Using splnet in rt_if_track may be to protective but we can reconsider
>>> that if the panic is gone.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>
>> Hi Claudio,
>> I will test this diff today and I will get back to you with result.
>> Thanks,
>>
>
> I got other negative feedback (in other words the panic still happens).  
> So
> as we're right before release the best thing is to turn the featrue of  
> for
> now. So that we don't ship broken code in 4.5.
>
> Could you test this diff instead?

Yeah I did.. and it works.. So it disabled rt_if_track? how 'bout "sending  
half of the data to nirvana" things on a multipath routing situation? is  
it affected?
Thanks.

-- 
insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom