Re: NAT, Firewall & pf

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Vasek
Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - 3:45 am

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:


Are you sure that ext_if = "sk0" and int_if = "sk1" and not the other way 
round?

Btw, if you want you firewall to answer your ISP's ping packages, add the 
following line (11):
pass in on $ext_if inet proto icmp from any to $ext_if icmp-type echoreq

Regards,
David
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
NAT, Firewall & pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Mon Feb 23, 6:58 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, kevin thompson, (Mon Feb 23, 9:09 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, patrick keshishian, (Mon Feb 23, 9:32 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jason Dixon, (Mon Feb 23, 9:33 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, patrick keshishian, (Mon Feb 23, 9:37 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, johan beisser, (Mon Feb 23, 9:47 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jason Dixon, (Mon Feb 23, 9:55 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, patrick keshishian, (Mon Feb 23, 10:11 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, patrick keshishian, (Mon Feb 23, 10:13 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, johan beisser, (Mon Feb 23, 10:18 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Toni Mueller, (Tue Feb 24, 3:09 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, (private) HKS, (Tue Feb 24, 6:52 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jorge Enrique Valbue ..., (Tue Feb 24, 7:38 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Tue Feb 24, 10:08 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Tue Feb 24, 10:10 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, (private) HKS, (Tue Feb 24, 10:48 am)
Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Jean-Francois, (Tue Feb 24, 11:43 am)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Jason Dixon, (Tue Feb 24, 11:55 am)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Etienne Robillard, (Tue Feb 24, 12:05 pm)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Tim Donahue, (Tue Feb 24, 12:10 pm)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Daniel A. Ramaley, (Tue Feb 24, 12:10 pm)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Tony Abernethy, (Tue Feb 24, 12:12 pm)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, richardtoohey, (Tue Feb 24, 12:12 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Tue Feb 24, 10:48 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Tue Feb 24, 10:49 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, patrick keshishian, (Tue Feb 24, 11:38 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jean-Francois, (Wed Feb 25, 12:20 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, David Vasek, (Wed Feb 25, 3:45 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, ropers, (Wed Feb 25, 5:07 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, patrick keshishian, (Wed Feb 25, 5:39 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Rod Whitworth, (Wed Feb 25, 6:10 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 6:15 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, patrick keshishian, (Wed Feb 25, 6:39 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 6:50 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jorge Enrique Valbue ..., (Wed Feb 25, 7:08 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Rod Whitworth, (Wed Feb 25, 7:14 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 7:27 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Rod Whitworth, (Wed Feb 25, 9:05 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 9:45 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, patrick keshishian, (Wed Feb 25, 9:53 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, patrick keshishian, (Wed Feb 25, 10:00 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, ropers, (Wed Feb 25, 10:47 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 11:28 pm)