Re: NAT, Firewall & pf

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Hilco Wijbenga
Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 10:49 pm

2009/2/23 johan beisser <jb@caustic.org>:

Yep, that gets everything working.

I'd like to understand why, though. From what I've read in my books
and in the replies what Jason suggested should have worked. Why is all
this extra stuff needed?

Specifically, why do I need the next to last line? Would that not be
for offering services to the Internet? (I'd like to enjoy my working
box for a few hours before I start experimenting again so I haven't
tried it without this line.) :-)

So, yes, it's working but I don't like not understanding why. I'll
need to do a bit more research, I guess.

Cheers,
Hilco
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Mon Feb 23, 6:58 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, kevin thompson, (Mon Feb 23, 9:09 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, patrick keshishian, (Mon Feb 23, 9:32 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jason Dixon, (Mon Feb 23, 9:33 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, patrick keshishian, (Mon Feb 23, 9:37 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, johan beisser, (Mon Feb 23, 9:47 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jason Dixon, (Mon Feb 23, 9:55 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, patrick keshishian, (Mon Feb 23, 10:11 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, patrick keshishian, (Mon Feb 23, 10:13 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, johan beisser, (Mon Feb 23, 10:18 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Toni Mueller, (Tue Feb 24, 3:09 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, (private) HKS, (Tue Feb 24, 6:52 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jorge Enrique Valbue ..., (Tue Feb 24, 7:38 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Tue Feb 24, 10:08 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Tue Feb 24, 10:10 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, (private) HKS, (Tue Feb 24, 10:48 am)
Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Jean-Francois, (Tue Feb 24, 11:43 am)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Jason Dixon, (Tue Feb 24, 11:55 am)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Etienne Robillard, (Tue Feb 24, 12:05 pm)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Tim Donahue, (Tue Feb 24, 12:10 pm)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Daniel A. Ramaley, (Tue Feb 24, 12:10 pm)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, Tony Abernethy, (Tue Feb 24, 12:12 pm)
Re: Unfortunate dot was ... missing, richardtoohey, (Tue Feb 24, 12:12 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Tue Feb 24, 10:48 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall & pf, Hilco Wijbenga, (Tue Feb 24, 10:49 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, patrick keshishian, (Tue Feb 24, 11:38 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jean-Francois, (Wed Feb 25, 12:20 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, David Vasek, (Wed Feb 25, 3:45 am)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, ropers, (Wed Feb 25, 5:07 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, patrick keshishian, (Wed Feb 25, 5:39 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Rod Whitworth, (Wed Feb 25, 6:10 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 6:15 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, patrick keshishian, (Wed Feb 25, 6:39 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 6:50 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jorge Enrique Valbue ..., (Wed Feb 25, 7:08 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Rod Whitworth, (Wed Feb 25, 7:14 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 7:27 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Rod Whitworth, (Wed Feb 25, 9:05 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 9:45 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, patrick keshishian, (Wed Feb 25, 9:53 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, patrick keshishian, (Wed Feb 25, 10:00 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, ropers, (Wed Feb 25, 10:47 pm)
Re: NAT, Firewall &amp; pf, Jason Dixon, (Wed Feb 25, 11:28 pm)