Ted Unangst wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Laurens Vets <laurens@daemon.be> wrote:
>> Dale Rahn wrote:
>>> But this one isn't: 64MB ram, 800x480 resolution, unmentioned arm
>>> processor
>>> at unmentioned MHz, WindowsCE instead of linux?
>> The Always Innovating Touch Book maybe?
>>
>> http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/home/index.htm
> 
> My current laptop also weighs three pounds, same as the touch book,
> but has a 113% bigger screen with 110% more pixels, 12 times as much
> RAM, 10 times as much storage, a keyboard that works, and probably
> about 16 times the processing power.
> 
> OK, I get that I'm not in the market for a netbook, but that's exactly
> the point.  For people who want a real computer, suggesting they use
> arm chips is a joke.  This is not the first time the issue has come
> up, nor is it the first time that someone has posted a link to a
> company selling a product nobody has actually ever seen.

But it's not ARM, is it? :)

Tbh, I was just replying to Dale's comment: "I would love to see a 
decent (cortex based?) arm laptop/netbook."