Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Janne Johansson
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 - 12:52 am

Joachim Schipper wrote:

Also, fsck may fail in the middle due to lack of memory, so moving the
dump to a bigger box to make it run through may be a good solution in
that case. Or old fsck fails where a -current fsck won't.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Jose Fragoso, (Fri Oct 2, 5:15 am)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Marcos Laufer, (Fri Oct 2, 9:15 am)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Otto Moerbeek, (Fri Oct 2, 10:31 am)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, frantisek holop, (Fri Oct 2, 1:38 pm)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Brad Tilley, (Fri Oct 2, 1:43 pm)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Otto Moerbeek, (Fri Oct 2, 1:49 pm)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Mauro Rezzonico, (Fri Oct 2, 3:12 pm)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Otto Moerbeek, (Sat Oct 3, 1:04 am)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Mauro Rezzonico, (Sat Oct 3, 2:19 am)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, frantisek holop, (Sun Oct 4, 10:58 am)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Otto Moerbeek, (Sun Oct 4, 11:29 am)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Joachim Schipper, (Sun Oct 4, 11:36 am)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, James Hartley, (Sun Oct 4, 12:50 pm)
Re: automating 'fsck -y' after a power failure, Janne Johansson, (Wed Oct 7, 12:52 am)